New Polaroid i2 camera giving .2m triangle error

End Table

A
End Table

  • 1
  • 1
  • 78
Cafe Art

A
Cafe Art

  • 8
  • 6
  • 200
Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 6
  • 3
  • 195
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 6
  • 3
  • 180

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,661
Messages
2,762,617
Members
99,434
Latest member
Anarchyth
Recent bookmarks
0

dreborn

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
3
Location
los angeles
Format
Instant Films
hi! for some reason my new polaroid i2 is giving me an error showing a triangle and <0.2m and won't take a shot in auto mode (or any other mode). i am not covering the lens and my subject is not close. so no idea what's going on.

any ideas? thanks!
 

rcphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Messages
321
Location
Kentucky
Format
Medium Format
Since it's new, I'd call the company or return it to where you bought it. That's a pretty pricey polaroid to be DOA.
 
OP
OP

dreborn

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
3
Location
los angeles
Format
Instant Films
i agree! it's fairly frustrating. i submitted to polaroid support hopefully ill get a response soon.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,105
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Doesn't have a protective film over the Lidar transducer, does it?
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,105
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
unless I’m super silly I can’t find any plastic on any other the sensors

Well, it was worth checking. Could also just be a defective part. To Lidar, "too close" means effectively zero return time (there and back comes to about 2 nanoseconds per foot, or 6-ish per meter).
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,219
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
there and back comes to about 2 nanoseconds per foot

That's a very useful - and easy to remember - value for the speed of light: 1 nS/ft. I've been championing the value to the horror of physicists everywhere for some time now.

3 x 10 ^ what-the-hell km/sec, or is it m/sec ... I can't remember. 1 nS/ft - now that sticks in my head and is really useful as most earth-bound things are in the feet range of dimension.

If you aren't working in optics or photonics this is all irrelevantly geeky.
 

Bushcat

Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2022
Messages
121
Location
Tokyo
Format
35mm RF
That's a very useful - and easy to remember - value for the speed of light: 1 nS/ft. I've been championing the value to the horror of physicists everywhere for some time now.

3 x 10 ^ what-the-hell km/sec, or is it m/sec ... I can't remember. 1 nS/ft - now that sticks in my head and is really useful as most earth-bound things are in the feet range of dimension.

If you aren't working in optics or photonics this is all irrelevantly geeky.

Circuit boards, too: hence the meanders on motherboards to make sure all the bits you just sent in parallel arrive simultaneously at their destination. Here's an animated GIF showing design software helping with the calculations. https://www.electronics-lab.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/MeanderEagle.gif
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom