New mini-Polaroid film format

Lacock Abbey detail

A
Lacock Abbey detail

  • 0
  • 1
  • 10
Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 35
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 61
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 55
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 47

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,905
Messages
2,782,818
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

Nicholas W

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
50
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Format
Multi Format
It's not much smaller than an Instax Mini camera, but I'll give 'em it is a little -- and the film is a little smaller than Instax Mini, too. I'll be curious to see whether it holds up in the market...

They have been REALLY pushing it the past few months - which leads me to believe it might not be selling super well. RIP spectra.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,995
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
The Instax just has more going for it. I'm really tired of buying Polaroid film for the SX-70 for example, and having maybe a third of the shots turning out exposed correctly, and without those pesky opacification failure streaks!
 

Nicholas W

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
50
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Format
Multi Format
The Instax just has more going for it. I'm really tired of buying Polaroid film for the SX-70 for example, and having maybe a third of the shots turning out exposed correctly, and without those pesky opacification failure streaks!

It’s apples to oranges at this point, for me - they’re just too different and both have their strengths and weaknesses. I personally prefer Polaroid film vastly for most applications, let alone for their cameras. But, I could see why someone would like Fuji better - and that’s fine. It’s like 60s muscle cars versus 90s performance JDM cars. Different audiences within the sphere of niche cars.

That being said - if you’re not using one of the roll-up film shields (available on the Polaroid website), you should get one. It will stop Opacifier failure, and you’ll get richer color. The difference is quite drastic
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,995
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
It’s apples to oranges at this point, for me - they’re just too different and both have their strengths and weaknesses. I personally prefer Polaroid film vastly for most applications, let alone for their cameras. But, I could see why someone would like Fuji better - and that’s fine. It’s like 60s muscle cars versus 90s performance JDM cars. Different audiences within the sphere of niche cars.

That being said - if you’re not using one of the roll-up film shields (available on the Polaroid website), you should get one. It will stop Opacifier failure, and you’ll get richer color. The difference is quite drastic

I am using a frog tongue on the SX-70. Sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. What it always does though is prevent the print from completely passing through the rollers, so that there is about a 4mm band at the top of every print.
By the way, my favourite car has always been and always will be the '63 Corvette. One day I WILL own one. 😁
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom