Is it a vintage pocket watch, or a new one? There are new ones to be had but I have no idea how they stack up against some of the beauties of the past.There was an article that appeared in the WSJ several years ago that the owner of SWATCH was going to stop selling movements to the major Swiss watchmakers, hoping to force them to begin remaking their own parts because he thought the crafts would disappear. A short while after article appeared, he died. Never heard any more about this.
During the summer I also prefer a pocket watch.
Half a dozen years ago I went with a Citizen Eco-drive, which gains and loses maybe a second a month and never needs a battery.
Yes, Leica give you an opportunity to fritter it away all at once.
So it sounds like the worst of all possible worlds is buying the Leica watch on credit.Is it more noble to fritter it away in monthly installments paid to the credit card companies? Thanks but no thanks, I'll take the watch.
Just checked them out and there's some nice watches there = at a lot cheaper prices than the red dotted ones as well!!!
One lovely looking one 9to me anyway) is even advertised at half price at £149.50 (reduced from £299.00):
https://www.firstclasswatches.co.uk...brown-leather-chrono-100m-at2418-00l-p-48517/
Shame, but I was only recently bought a nice watch and am not really in need of a new one... but then I say that about cameras when I've got loads already, so...
Terry S
-- haven't had to spend $10 a year replacing the battery...in a cupla more years it will have paid for itself.
charlie
My grandfather’s 1918 Hamilton rr watch runs a littl fast but repair is now too expensive. Railroad watches required the crystal to be screwed off to change time so the time could not be inadvertently changed while winding, because rr used to run on very tight schedules. So, besides my Backwards Goofy, I have a wafer thin Gubelin and an Omega.Is it a vintage pocket watch, or a new one? There are new ones to be had but I have no idea how they stack up against some of the beauties of the past.
They're aimed at the small penis types who buy BMW's and leave them on the driveway so everyone can see they have one.
There was an article that appeared in the WSJ several years ago that the owner of SWATCH was going to stop selling movements to the major Swiss watchmakers, hoping to force them to begin remaking their own parts because he thought the crafts would disappear. A short while after article appeared, he died. Never heard any more about this....
The last time I saw a Rebok shoe for $15 was in the late 1960s.An Good example some years ago, is Rebok shoes. This was a shoe cheap that sold in US for $15. New management put $35 marketing in each shoe and was able to sell more of the same cheap $15 shoe at $50 than at $15.
.... Also, I don’t believe that Disney makes watches....
I know that there are some watchmakers who still make watches, but they are usually in the $100,000 price range.
...
Yes -- once Consumer Reports did a contest between a Rolex Oyster and a Hello-Kitty quartz watch for $4 -- you can imagine who won.
I used to see the airmall catalog selling those winding boxes for watches -- $100 or so for one watch, and up for many. The mind boggles...
I was a "Mechanical watch or nothing" guy for years when you could still buy decent wind-up watches at sane prices -- Half a dozen years ago I went with a Citizen Eco-drive, which gains and loses maybe a second a month and never needs a battery. Now I fantasize about winning the Longitude prize with it....such is progress.
The last time I saw a Rebok shoe for $15 was in the late 1960s.
It was quite an extensive article. The owner of SWATC understood that his watches are fashion decor, but said that he was going to stop selling to high end watch companies in order to force them to again make their own movements...
I don’t know if the late owner of SWATCH included all such makers, but he was concerned that watchmaking craft was in a precarious state should be continued, hence his threat to stop selling movements. He died before planned expiration of sales, so I have no idea how his plans turned out. In recent years, the sale of Swiss watches has steeply declined,primarily with slowdown of Chinese market for “prestige” watches, with backup of maker’s inventory.
I know several watch collectors. They are just as nutty as camera collectors. There is nothing wrong with being nutty and collectors play an important roll in preserving the past.
I may be wrong, but wasn’t the Hassy 35mm landscape format camera a rebadged Fuji?
But whatever, back to the Leica watch: enough has been said about people willingly being separated from their money.
Maybe the late owner of SWATCH should have upgraded, repaired or replaces HIS works.
The the Leica watch require a CLA every few years?
...
Just playing Devils Advocate here.......
Their over-priced cameras do not take any better pictures than my Canon AT-1.
And now their over-priced watch will not keep time as well as my $50.00 flip phone, that is 7 years old, and can also make a phone call.
Brilliant.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?