New Copyright Laws

[ajmiller]

An unattributed copy and paste off the internet?
Be good to actually know where it comes from Steve.

 

[Dr Croubie]

An unattributed copy and paste off the internet?
Be good to actually know where it comes from Steve.

Don't worry, it's not a photo. You're allowed to just copy-paste text, that's not copyright-protected...

 

[paul_c5x4]

The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 –Your photos and you

Quoted from www.ipo.gov.uk/hargreaves-orphanmyth.pdf as issued by the Dead Link Removed

 

[ajmiller]

Thanks for the link Paul, useful info.

 

[ajmiller]

ok - I'm still interested in the source - of which a link has been upped.

cheers

Don't worry, it's not a photo. You're allowed to just copy-paste text, that's not copyright-protected...

 

[Steve Smith]

An unattributed copy and paste off the internet?
Be good to actually know where it comes from Steve.

Sorry. You are absolutely right. I did it in a hurry on my way out.

The source has already been posted now.

It was a copy and paste from another forum.

If anyone missed it: Dead Link Removed


Steve.

 

[Sirius Glass]

OP, just do not post photographs on the internet and you will not have a problem. <== my solution

 

[lxdude]

Keep your jpeg content modest in the first place and that's all they will be able
to steal.

Good advice, that.

 

[Poisson Du Jour]

OP, just do not post photographs on the internet and you will not have a problem. <== my solution

Nothing more needs to be said.

 

[Diapositivo]

A friend told me the Luftwaffe bombed London on 76 consecutive nights during WW11, and all that was left of it was cardboard and paint

An encyclopaedia told me that RAF bombed Berlin on August 20, 1940, starting the "total war"*, and that Hitler got (predictably) very very pissed and ordered a mass scale bombardment over Britain, of which the famous first London bombing of September 7th (or 9th, go by memory) was only the beginning.

Same encyclopaedia says many historians think the Berlin bombing was a smart move by Churchill, who imagined Hitler would respond with a massive bombing campaign over Britain thus - giving the technology of the times - sacrificing many bombing planes and in a sense making more difficult or impossible a subsequent invasion of Britain.

In fact the Battle of Britain, which until August 1940 was largely, largely, largely being won by the Germans, had a reversal during the bombing campaign so that the number of planes shot down in the two armed forces, by end of 1940, was roughly the same.

Many historians would agree that Hitler never thought to invade Britain in spring 1941, in fact he invaded the Soviet Union and those things are prepared quite in advance.

The bombing raids on London are mainly due to the sagacity and the strategic acumen of Mr Churchill. A reinstatement of the sagacity and acumen he showed about Gallipoli during WWI.

Fabrizio

Never knew of 11 warld wars, there were only 2 in my memory . I and II are Roman numerals. 1 and 11 are Arab numerals. It's WWII. One usually pronounces it "second world war". Just like Pope Alexander VI is Alexander the Sixth (not Six), and the XX century is the twentieth century (not twenty). It's cardinal but it's read usually as an ordinal, as a strange custom of life. Exceptions apply. YMMV.

Sorry for the OT.

* Actually not really. Germany had already started a total war against Poland with the shelling of Warsaw. There was no total war between Germany and UK until the Berlin bombing, though.

 

[Steve Smith]

The bombing raids on London are mainly due to the sagacity and the strategic acumen of Mr Churchill.

My grandfather had nothing good to say about Churchill and considered him to be a warmonger.


Steve.

 

[benjiboy]

An encyclopaedia told me that RAF bombed Berlin on August 20, 1940, starting the "total war"*, and that Hitler got (predictably) very very pissed and ordered a mass scale bombardment over Britain, of which the famous first London bombing of September 7th (or 9th, go by memory) was only the beginning.

Same encyclopaedia says many historians think the Berlin bombing was a smart move by Churchill, who imagined Hitler would respond with a massive bombing campaign over Britain thus - giving the technology of the times - sacrificing many bombing planes and in a sense making more difficult or impossible a subsequent invasion of Britain.

In fact the Battle of Britain, which until August 1940 was largely, largely, largely being won by the Germans, had a reversal during the bombing campaign so that the number of planes shot down in the two armed forces, by end of 1940, was roughly the same.

Many historians would agree that Hitler never thought to invade Britain in spring 1941, in fact he invaded the Soviet Union and those things are prepared quite in advance.

The bombing raids on London are mainly due to the sagacity and the strategic acumen of Mr Churchill. A reinstatement of the sagacity and acumen he showed about Gallipoli during WWI.

Fabrizio

Never knew of 11 warld wars, there were only 2 in my memory . I and II are Roman numerals. 1 and 11 are Arab numerals. It's WWII. One usually pronounces it "second world war". Just like Pope Alexander VI is Alexander the Sixth (not Six), and the XX century is the twentieth century (not twenty). It's cardinal but it's read usually as an ordinal, as a strange custom of life. Exceptions apply. YMMV.

Sorry for the OT.

* Actually not really. Germany had already started a total war against Poland with the shelling of Warsaw. There was no total war between Germany and UK until the Berlin bombing, though.

I have neither the time or inclination to dignify this incorrect incomprehensible uninformed babble with an answer.Read this.;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blitz

 

[Sirius Glass]

My grandfather had nothing good to say about Churchill and considered him to be a warmonger.


Steve.

That was probably the reason I never bothered to listen to your grandfather. He was the one who thought the Neville Chamberlain was a brilliant politician, wasn't he?

 

[Diapositivo]

I have neither the time or inclination to dignify this incorrect incomprehensible uninformed babble with an answer.Read this.;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blitz

I'm sorry you take is in such an irritated way. Facts are facts.
Even the page you link says the same:

<<
This was a result of a rapid escalation starting on 24 August 1940, when night bombers aiming for RAF airfields drifted off course and accidentally destroyed several London homes, killing civilians, combined with Churchill's immediate response of bombing Berlin.
>>

Obviously the bombing of Berlin has nothing to do, really, with the accidental and patently unintentional off-mark fall of some bombs directed to a RAF airport during a nocturne bombing raid. Besides, bombings take days (or weeks) to plan and execute. The Berlin bombing was probably planned in advance and would have been executed in any case. The off-mark German bombs were taken as an excuse in front of history, public opinion etc.

If you have an Encyclopaedia Americana at home or at your local library you find a very nice "Battle of Britain" article stating the point of view that I expressed above.

History it's history. Don't take it as a religion. Re-examination of history past is the only way to avoid falling into the same mistakes in the future.

Relax. If you don't declare war to them anymore, they won't bomb you anymore

With friendship
Fabrizio

 

[Steve Smith]

That was probably the reason I never bothered to listen to your grandfather. He was the one who thought the Neville Chamberlain was a brilliant politician, wasn't he?

No. He was one of the few people I have talked to who actually lived through the war years and told me of Churchill's eagerness to send in planes, ships, men, etc. as a show of force - often with disastrous consequences.


Steve.

 

[predatore2005]

Nowdays the problem is that social media is sharing tons and tons of images that are copyrighted! When you have to register a trademark in south america you do a search, when you register an image with copyrights you start a process in the official office of the country. Once you have the process done, you can share the image and put the legal details.

 

[Xmas]

The Germans bombed London during WWI with lighter than air and heavier craft.
The Germans had killed a lot of people before the UK and France delivered an ultimatum, eg in Spainish cities.

 

[Xmas]

Nowdays the problem is that social media is sharing tons and tons of images that are copyrighted! When you have to register a trademark in south america you do a search, when you register an image with copyrights you start a process in the official office of the country. Once you have the process done, you can share the image and put the legal details.

All images are copyright cept if you are a chimp...

 

[Xmas]

http://media.gn.apc.org/fl/1206afp.html

An acquaintance nice girl did a coffee table book high quality prints.
Half way through the first pint in a chain pub she notices a nice pic on the wall...
Every one has a scanner nowadays.

 

[RobC]

These days desktop monitor resolutions have increased to a common size of 1920x1080 pixels. There are larger monitor sizes too and there is a new standard of 4000 which is designed primarily for very high definition Video.

The result of this is that web developers are putting ever larger images into websites which will fill the screen without the image file being "stretched" so that they display with high quality. So currently an image size of around 2400x1600 will display at high quality on the vast majority of monitors.
The problem with this is that an image that size will make high quality 8x5.3in print or at 200dpi will give a decent enough 12x8inch print.
Also web images of 2400x1600 can be sucessfully upsized without losing too much quality.

So where in the past web images were to small to be of any use to anyone else except for web display, these days that isn't the case and I think placing very obvious watermarks with your web address in them is now required which is a PITA because it spoils the look of your image on the web. It does however disuade most people from trying to use your web images for financial gain or web use.

And note that in the original posting the link to the register says:

"The Act contains changes to UK copyright law which permit the commercial exploitation of images where information identifying the owner is missing"

I take that to mean that all you need to do is put a copyright notice in your image such as:

"©Joe Blogs www.mydomain.com"

and then no one can say the image is an orphan since the image contains your copyright notice, your name and your web address.

 

[pdeeh]

in a chain pub she notices a nice pic on the wall...
.

well i do hope she has contacted the chain's media manager and sorted out how much money they are going to pay her to compensate for their piracy