"new color process" from China?

Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 8
  • 2
  • 81
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 119
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 6
  • 259

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,745
Messages
2,780,245
Members
99,692
Latest member
jglong
Recent bookmarks
0

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Moved to the Hybrid Discussion sub-forum.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
what seems to be a modern variation of Lippmann's process.

I do not see it as variation of the Lippmann proces, to far off to me. But both processes share that they are based not on absorption (dyes) for colour production, but on interfence. The results of such are meanwhile called "structural colours".
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It is not a hybrid, but a pure digital process.
No, but the question relates to its potential use in a hybrid workflow.
Just like digital negatives.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I do not read it this way, but I got your point.
 
OP
OP

Nitrous

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
12
Format
35mm
It is not a hybrid, but a pure digital process.
Could you explain to me the "purely digital" nature of this process?
Interference patterns aren't digital, are they?
I've never heard structural color being described as "digital"
It certainly is an alternative process to produce colors :smile:
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
"Could you explain to me the "purely digital" nature of this process?"
You need a digital image file and a digital printer.to produce this dot pattern.

"Interference patterns aren't digital, are they?"
In this case they are. It seems to me you did not understand that paper. Interference as such is not digital, but in this case interference is applied digitally.

I've never heard structural color being described as "digital""
Structural colour is a rather new term. And I did not describe it as digital. But in this case structural colour is applied digitally.

"It certainly is an alternative process to produce colors :smile:"
I did not question this.


I am busy with imaging systems and so far structural colour never got out of a tiny niche in photography. As attractive and simple it seems problems are envisible already. But Fischer with his couplers was as this stage too about 100 years ago, when he got stuck... And structural colour can yield amazing results.
In this very case the digital approach seems the promising way.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Well, I've never heard of structural color and I'm a painter, it's either additive or subtraction color. So I looked it up and I have no idea how something like that could be used in photography to any great extent, but now at least I know what it is. How could that be hung on a wall though? Would something composed of structural colors look that different that the usual manner?
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Well, I've never heard of structural color and I'm a painter, it's either additive or subtraction color.

Subtractive colour is obviously caused by filtration. And as painter you still handle this as dye filtration. But in most enlargers this already is structural colour...

In the context of this thread though with structural colour is meant that the image information itself is structural colour.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom