• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

New backpack day!

Tablao Flamenco

A
Tablao Flamenco

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 1
  • 2
  • 55

Forum statistics

Threads
204,325
Messages
2,867,159
Members
102,223
Latest member
jeffwiedner
Recent bookmarks
1

IpseLux

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2026
Messages
181
Location
East Tennessee
Format
35mm
For years my main bag was a huge, canvas, Tenba bag, big enough for 2 SLRs with drives and zooms, 4 big zoom or Telephoto lens or flash combos, and 5 huge pockets and a zip pocket on the flap for tons of stuff.
But with the addition of lenses, more bodies, and more flashes, it was time for another.
Went the Pelican case, but not very ergonomic.
Got a great bag today, a backpack. Best part: $37.00 at a popular used photo website in Georgia.
Folks, it’s a Lowepro Mini Trekker AW Backpack, and it is spectacular.
Here’s a pic.
I highly recommend these.
Kind regards!
(Make no mention of the SLRs….
I must admit, this rigid separation of analog, digital, hybrid, to just post a bag review is pretty nuts. At least it is to me.
Ha! Ha! Photography is photography.)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2340.jpeg
    IMG_2340.jpeg
    454.4 KB · Views: 73
How does a backpack work for you, practically? Do you carry those lenses and two cameras around on longer hikes? Where does the water, food, rain jacket etc. go, or do you only take one camera and 1-2 lenses and use the rest of the space for camera gear? When walking, do you keep one camera in hand/around your neck so it's there when you need it?

I'm wondering out of curiosity because it all seems so different from how I like to move about. When we hike, the emphasis on being out there, enjoying the landscape etc. I generally carry one camera and one or two lenses. Most of the time only a single lens is used. The camera is on my shoulder so it's there when I need it and I don't have to stop to take off the backpack, rummage around in it, take the shot, pack it all up again etc. I also hate having to lug around dead weight that isn't essential to hiking as such; camera gear for me is an add-on; the essentials are water, food, shelter/clothes.

On shorter walks of one-two hours I generally carry a shoulder bag, again 1 camera with 1-2 lenses, bottle of water, maybe an apple. No backpack.
 
I think it's just to replace a camera bag and not really be very useful as a hiking backpack. It's camera storage and transportation. Some people like to carry multiple lenses (and whatever else that other stuff is in that bag).
 
How does a backpack work for you, practically? Do you carry those lenses and two cameras around on longer hikes? Where does the water, food, rain jacket etc. go, or do you only take one camera and 1-2 lenses and use the rest of the space for camera gear? When walking, do you keep one camera in hand/around your neck so it's there when you need it?

I'm wondering out of curiosity because it all seems so different from how I like to move about. When we hike, the emphasis on being out there, enjoying the landscape etc. I generally carry one camera and one or two lenses. Most of the time only a single lens is used. The camera is on my shoulder so it's there when I need it and I don't have to stop to take off the backpack, rummage around in it, take the shot, pack it all up again etc. I also hate having to lug around dead weight that isn't essential to hiking as such; camera gear for me is an add-on; the essentials are water, food, shelter/clothes.

On shorter walks of one-two hours I generally carry a shoulder bag, again 1 camera with 1-2 lenses, bottle of water, maybe an apple. No backpack.

Yes, as D points out, most folks, and certainly myself at times find the best use for this pack as a transportation/travel bag. Walking is certainly that, as is hiking, but so is packing a car, taking overnight to a hotel, or to a shoot, and most definitely traveling abroad.
Now, the pack is small enough to serve as a half day hiking bag. And it need not be full to the rim.
An important lesson I could share with others is that is often if not always auspicious and prudent to travel with bags empty, so that necessary or desirable items may be added as needed. It’s always good to bring something back from any travel.
But to your question, I consider backpacks the premier packing option for me. The fact that this one is specialized for photography, and is the right size, and that is smaller than normal, as photo gear is generally heavy to begin with, is spectacular. All in one place. All well protected. All easily carried. And in case of danger, all can be transported fast!!!
I often placed stuff in various other bags and packs. But things would get misplaced and lost, scratched, dented, …. This way is better, for me.
Aluminum cases are way over the top. Pelican cases are great for airplane checked in, but are not ergonomic, and often are too big. Especially trains and metros overseas.
And the ever popular rolling case, is quite useful and versatile, in city environments, airports and cars, but I wouldn’t want to be dragging one in a 3million inhabitant city thru the streets.
The backpack rules.
It can also be attached quite well to a Surly Disctrucker, placed on a chicken bus rack, or airplane overhead.
In foreign settings of dubious safety, it sits well on the chest, as a front bag, while your main backpack rides back.
I tend to be a multi-camarist. I prefer to have and shoot three cameras at a time. Or with me. Two if I have to.
One is with me at all times, generally a Nikonos with 35mm or an FTn both with film.
I like to shoot phone first, for perspective. Digital to nail down the image. And lastly film, if it’s a great image and I want to save it for posterity.
My D850 shoots impressively, but I still consider slide and B&W film the perfect mediums. I’m talking about quality and resolution. I’m starting to shoot slide B&W film too, for convenience.
So having a backpack that carries two, while I handle the main camera is good for me.
Anyhow, for hikes, one or two cameras are about right, one one me, the other on a slinged fanny pack. Both with respective lenses, small.
If I need a travel tripod, the backpack comes with me.
And a huge advantage of the bp, is not necessarily more lenses, but more flashes. There’s an SB700 and a tiny Goddox there. But a 285HV with trigger and a Yongnuo manual/commander could replace them.
Light is the most important aspect in photography, imho.
Wanna make a good image, better? Bombard it with light. Make it explode, but do it naturally.
Great question K.
It took me back a bit. I’ve traveled far and wide with cameras. The stories are as important to me as the images I took.
Kind regards.
Happy hiking!
 
How does a backpack work for you, practically? Do you carry those lenses and two cameras around on longer hikes? Where does the water, food, rain jacket etc. go, or do you only take one camera and 1-2 lenses and use the rest of the space for camera gear? When walking, do you keep one camera in hand/around your neck so it's there when you need it?

I'm wondering out of curiosity because it all seems so different from how I like to move about. When we hike, the emphasis on being out there, enjoying the landscape etc. I generally carry one camera and one or two lenses. Most of the time only a single lens is used. The camera is on my shoulder so it's there when I need it and I don't have to stop to take off the backpack, rummage around in it, take the shot, pack it all up again etc. I also hate having to lug around dead weight that isn't essential to hiking as such; camera gear for me is an add-on; the essentials are water, food, shelter/clothes.

On shorter walks of one-two hours I generally carry a shoulder bag, again 1 camera with 1-2 lenses, bottle of water, maybe an apple. No backpack.

In the course of my job, I used to travel extensively by plane all over the US, Europe, and occasionally Asia. Over time, I learned that over-the-shoulder bags were causing shoulder, back, and neck stress that wasn't great. So I switched to backpacks. I am very much a fan of these. The amount of body stress it removed was pretty noticeable.

This then extended to camera bags. Most of my systems are pre-packed in a backpack of appropriate size. Before going out, I change out lenses, accessories, and so forth I will need for the duration of the day. If it is by car, that's all I need.

If by plane, I pack what I am taking into a Manfrotto backpack that just fits under the seat in front of me. I also pack a Lowepro Photo Runner in my luggage filling it with socks and such. When I get to destination, each day, I pack the Photo Runner with the camera/lenses I want and carry this bag with me.

I can get a 35mm RF or SLR with several lenses or a Hasselblad with a single lens plus a light meter into that bag. I've also packed it with a Leica LTM body with several lenses and a DSLR into that bag with careful packing. Sometimes I hang an small auxilliary bag off it to hold a Leica D-Lux.

The Photo Runner has the advantage that you can carry it cross body or around your waist. Either way, the bag sits in front of you to make theft more difficult. (It can be carried over shoulder, but I never do.) At the end of the day, the only stress I feel is if I've carried a heavy SLR/DSLR around my neck.
 
In the course of my job, I used to travel extensively by plane all over the US, Europe, and occasionally Asia. Over time, I learned that over-the-shoulder bags were causing shoulder, back, and neck stress that wasn't great. So I switched to backpacks. I am very much a fan of these. The amount of body stress it removed was pretty noticeable.

This then extended to camera bags. Most of my systems are pre-packed in a backpack of appropriate size. Before going out, I change out lenses, accessories, and so forth I will need for the duration of the day. If it is by car, that's all I need.

If by plane, I pack what I am taking into a Manfrotto backpack that just fits under the seat in front of me. I also pack a Lowepro Photo Runner in my luggage filling it with socks and such. When I get to destination, each day, I pack the Photo Runner with the camera/lenses I want and carry this bag with me.

I can get a 35mm RF or SLR with several lenses or a Hasselblad with a single lens plus a light meter into that bag. I've also packed it with a Leica LTM body with several lenses and a DSLR into that bag with careful packing. Sometimes I hang an small auxilliary bag off it to hold a Leica D-Lux.

The Photo Runner has the advantage that you can carry it cross body or around your waist. Either way, the bag sits in front of you to make theft more difficult. (It can be carried over shoulder, but I never do.) At the end of the day, the only stress I feel is if I've carried a heavy SLR/DSLR around my neck.

Absolutely!
 
I have a LowePro Sling bag. Works great for my purposes. Well suited to riding a motorcycle and just stopping for a quick shot or two.
 
Aluminum cases are way over the top. Pelican cases are great for airplane checked in, but are not ergonomic, and often are too big. Especially trains and metros overseas.
And the ever popular rolling case, is quite useful and versatile, in city environments, airports and cars, but I wouldn’t want to be dragging one in a 3million inhabitant city thru the streets.
When I was shooting weddings, the rigid case was packed, transported to location, set in an inconpicuous and somewhat secure location, and I would use it simply to transport stuff 'to location' and work out of a smaller shoulder bag which would be repopulated as needed from my 'depot location'.
I only used a 'daypack' for photography once...I had a month long sabbatical trip to Chile, and it served as a working bag as well as 'transportation' bag, while looking less conspicuous as a target for theft. But it was not as convenient to work out of, since its opening was only from the top. Photo backpack would have been more convenient to work out of, but it would be more identifiable for its purpose!
 
Last edited:
When I was shooting weddings, the rigid case was packed, transported to location, set in an inconpicuous and somewhat secure location, and I would use it simply to transport stuff 'to location' and work out of a smaller shoulder bag which would be repopulated as needed from my 'depot location'.
I only used a 'daypack' for photography once...I had a month long sabbatical trip to Chile, and it served as a working bag as well as 'transportation' bag, while looking less conspicuous as a target for theft. But it was not as convenient to work out of, since its opening was only from the top. Photo backpack would have been more convenient to work out of, but it would be more identifiable for its purpose!

I always feel like that Pentagon military dude, carrying top secret documents in an attache locked to his/her wrist when I carry the aluminum case. The pelican is a little less conspicuous but, …. Ha! Ha!
That is true, about having to zip up and down from the top.
My favorite setup, a friendly assistant, carrying the cameras and handing them to you as needed. Hollywood style, I guess.
I’ll probably be sewing up some patches and bits of old cloth to mine, to make it less conspicuous.
I live in a relatively safe town. But when shooting alone, it’s best not to tempt potential robbers. I’m not talking about weddings, that’d be a tough gig! Ha.
But around town….
Kind regards.
 
I learned while serving as a Marine that, since the seventh century, the maximum weight an infantryman can carry for a day's march and still be fit for combat is approximately fifty pounds; this has remained unchanged. I have always borne this in mind especially since as I grow older, a 35mm S.L.R body and three small lenses are now as much as I can manage
. I cringe over the years to think how much heavy gear I have carried over the years over hills and dales and. never used.
 
I learned while serving as a Marine that, since the seventh century, the maximum weight an infantryman can carry for a day's march and still be fit for combat is approximately fifty pounds; this has remained unchanged. I have always borne this in mind especially since as I grow older, a 35mm S.L.R body and three small lenses are now as much as I can manage
. I cringe over the years to think how much heavy gear I have carried over the years over hills and dales and. never used.

That’s good advice: 50lbs. How and what to pack is a lesson known to those who do it often. I certainly no longer am an efficient packer.
But from my past I’ve always know my walking stretch with a pack is four hours max. After that I’m out.
As I’ve grown old, now that is a pretty accurate comfortable driving time too.
Thanks for serving B.
 
I learned while serving as a Marine that, since the seventh century, the maximum weight an infantryman can carry for a day's march and still be fit for combat is approximately fifty pounds; this has remained unchanged. I have always borne this in mind especially since as I grow older, a 35mm S.L.R body and three small lenses are now as much as I can manage
. I cringe over the years to think how much heavy gear I have carried over the years over hills and dales and. never used.

I find that even 25 lbs or less is still stressful if I do not take care to balance the weight properly. It causes and uneven gait and back strain,

(Somewhere in your post there is an insider joke about how much crayons weigh :wink:
 
I found more than 35 pounds/16 kilos was uncomfortable for long distance hiking/backpacking. My knees won't even come close to that anymore w/o much grief.
 
I got this bag to haul my gear back and forth across the Oregon Dunes. With the weight of everything trying to do this with my shoulder bag would have been punishing.

I've started taking this up a local hill that's pretty much a 2000 foot high staircase, just to get myself in a enough shape that hauling this stuff isn't such a big deal.

pack1.jpg pack2.jpg
 
I got this bag to haul my gear back and forth across the Oregon Dunes. With the weight of everything trying to do this with my shoulder bag would have been punishing.

I've started taking this up a local hill that's pretty much a 2000 foot high staircase, just to get myself in a enough shape that hauling this stuff isn't such a big deal.

View attachment 425847 View attachment 425850

That’s a great setup. Yes, excercise helps, photo equipment is deceptively heavy.
Kind regards, T
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom