So in summary, it is in fact a high contrast film that has been treated by Adox to make it a low contrast or normal contrast film( which one is it in the scale of low to normal?) with the capability to be successfully developed in a whole range of developers and not just a tailor-made Adox developer and still have a speed of 50? Have I got this correct?
Where does this leave Rudeofus' large potential for pushing? While a speed of 50 in N Europe might make it usable for 3 out of the 4 seasons, even a yellow filter reduces it to 25 which is borderline hand-holdable and yellow-green or orange makes hand-holding near impossible unless the aperture is f8 or bigger. However it may be that another feature of the film is its ability to produce results with a one stop yellow filter that most other films can only achieve with orange and if so then a yellow at 25 might be fine and the use of other darker filters becomes unnecessary.
Can Mirko or others with knowledge comment on its ability to render a blue sky quite a bit darker than a yellow normally manages in say the U.K.
Thanks
pentaxuser
Where does this leave Rudeofus' large potential for pushing? While a speed of 50 in N Europe might make it usable for 3 out of the 4 seasons, even a yellow filter reduces it to 25 which is borderline hand-holdable and yellow-green or orange makes hand-holding near impossible unless the aperture is f8 or bigger.
I think the scale is units of LogE, as in ... each line is 1.0
I don’t think that it is 0.5 because I often study film over 3.0 units’ of exposure and I rarely see the shoulder (because most step wedges are 3.0). I aim to have the toe on the far left of my graphs, and a little over 3.0 across the x-axis fills my graph page.
If the scale were 0.5 LogE then six lines would cover 3.0 and, as I see, you would go from toe to shoulder. It’s not 0.5
Thanks Mirko,I would not see large push processing potential here unless you accept steep gamma in the midtones. What we made here is pretty much it in respect to speed options for a given nice gamma.
I guess it depends on which look you like.
The response to filtration is excellent (which means "yes" to your question). Not only are we presenting the new film but also our new line of *SNAP ON* gel-filters and we found this material to be one of the best.
Examples will follow shortly.
Thanks,
Mirko
As many others Adox use a graphic without unit for the sensitivity, also the light source is not defined. A classic wedge spectrograph that makes true comparison impossible. (What did not bother Apuggers so far...)
A manufacturer that aims at an engineering customer would would use as unit for instance J/m2, what of course would also take care of the spectral characteristic of the light source.
Actually, I wasn't really interested in any absolute numbers and units in the X axis. I'd simply like to know how many stops it translates to, in order to get an estimate of this film's latitude.
I would not see large push processing potential here unless you accept steep gamma in the midtones. What we made here is pretty much it in respect to speed options for a given nice gamma.
I guess it depends on which look you like.
The response to filtration is excellent (which means "yes" to your question). Not only are we presenting the new film but also our new line of *SNAP ON* gel-filters and we found this material to be one of the best.
Examples will follow shortly.
Thanks,
Mirko
Funny statement, knowing they were the first major producer who closed. Yes, I know it was Agfa Leverkusen and it was mostly color emulsion. But still funny.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?