New 8x10 Field cameras

Plot Foiled

H
Plot Foiled

  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
FedEx Bread

H
FedEx Bread

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
Unusual House Design

D
Unusual House Design

  • 4
  • 2
  • 59
Leaves.jpg

A
Leaves.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 71
Walking Away

Walking Away

  • 2
  • 0
  • 110

Forum statistics

Threads
197,962
Messages
2,767,339
Members
99,514
Latest member
Emanuel Schi
Recent bookmarks
0

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,802
Format
8x10 Format
Thirty pounds does seem a bit heavy for the tripod, but never underestimate the importance of a reasonably solid tripod, even with a lighter
weight 8x10. And I personally never use a tripod head for 8x10, because they tend to be the root of all evil in terms of stability, and are the
first place you can realistically save weight - leave em home!
 

Black Dog

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
4,291
Location
Running up that hill
Format
Multi Format
Interesting discussion-thanks all!
 
OP
OP
Peter Rockstroh01
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
140
Location
Bogota, Colombia
Format
Multi Format
Thirty pounds does seem a bit heavy for the tripod, but never underestimate the importance of a reasonably solid tripod, even with a lighter
weight 8x10. And I personally never use a tripod head for 8x10, because they tend to be the root of all evil in terms of stability, and are the
first place you can realistically save weight - leave em home!

I got my tripod with the camera. It has a Majestic tripod head built in 1680, that weighs a few Kilogram and is probably made from Plutonium. But until I find. reasonable substitute It"ll have to do. I'll start looking for a lighter option next ytpear,

C.heers.,.;.

Peter
 

Alan Gales

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,253
Location
St. Louis, M
Format
Large Format
Thirty pounds does seem a bit heavy for the tripod, but never underestimate the importance of a reasonably solid tripod, even with a lighter
weight 8x10. And I personally never use a tripod head for 8x10, because they tend to be the root of all evil in terms of stability, and are the
first place you can realistically save weight - leave em home!

Both my Ries tripods sport Ries double tilt heads. They seem pretty stable to me although I do know what you are talking about with some heads.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,802
Format
8x10 Format
Ries understands the problem. That why they designed their heads as basically adjustable platforms with a minimum of height. I just use the
top the tripod, period, just like early surveyors did it. A bit of practice and it becomes easy.
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
I got my tripod with the camera. It has a Majestic tripod head built in 1680, that weighs a few Kilogram and is probably made from Plutonium. But until I find. reasonable substitute It"ll have to do. I'll start looking for a lighter option next ytpear,

Wow what an antique!! :D
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, they started making tripods before they had even thought of cameras.. Must be of Leonardo Da Vinci production!

It's prolly what da Vinci used to "lift" his helicopter.:tongue:
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,802
Format
8x10 Format
Guess what medieval machine the rack and pinion gearing of your view camera came from? Then after they stretched you on the rack,
your arms would be long enough to handle the tilt control on the front standard at a long bellows extension. They thought of everything.
Even that bellows was handy for stoking the fire that kept boiling oil nice n' hot before they dumped up over the castle wall upon invading
digital photographers.
 

Neil Poulsen

Member
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
520
Format
4x5 Format
Thirty pounds does seem a bit heavy for the tripod . . .

30 pounds! GOOD HEAVENS, that's HEAVY! Even my heavy-duty Linhof weighs less than 20 pounds. (30 pounds . . . jeepers.)

One word of advice . . .

SELL!

. . . And I personally never use a tripod head for 8x10, because they tend to be the root of all evil in terms of stability, and are the first place you can realistically save weight - leave em home!

Interesting; a good point.
 

Neil Poulsen

Member
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
520
Format
4x5 Format
I have to say, I really like my Deardorff. What makes a Deardorff for me is the 1 inch (or, a little more?) up/down adjustment on the front standard. Plus, they're a beautiful camera.

I think that the trick in purchasing a Deardorff is finding one that has tight adjustments. Mine's about a 1948 or '49 camera that was in nearly new condition when I purchased it a few years ago. With new parts that are available at that auction site, I added front swing, and I have parts to upgrade the lensboard holder.

With that said, watch the dealer that sells these new parts. Purchase only through the auction site, so that you have some clout in getting them shipped within a reasonable period of time.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom