Need suggestions for exposing and developing Arista EDU Ultra 200 in 120 format.

[gone]

I've been shooting the 35mm and 120 versions of Arista EDU Ultra 100 and getting good results in Mic-X and Rodinal. Generally it's exposed at 100 to 150 ISO with a yellow filter, or 150 to 200 w/o a filter. W/ the Mic-X full strength there's not much grain even in 35mm, and what grain there is looks OK by me. The Rodinal is essentially grain less in 120 using 1:25, and not bad even w/ 35mm. This is really a great film for the small amount of money they want for it.

The one roll I have of the 200 ISO film in 120 format is probably different than the 100 (I think they're different Foma films?), so I was wondering where I might start my metering at, considering that these 2 developers are what I have ready to go? Or since it's 120, maybe it isn't that critical?

Here's two from the 100 that were shot yesterday w/ a Canon FT QL and developed in Mic-X. From what I understand, the 200 should give more of an old school look than the 100? That's what I'm looking for, something more dated looking than the two examples below.

 

[miha]

Fomapan 200 is the most modern film in the Foma line. I expose it at EI 100 and develop it in T-MAX developer for around 6 minutes. It pushes well too. I have exposed it under average home lighting conditions during the night at f2.8 and 1/30 with my Mamiya C330 (no meter around) and developed it in T-MAX for 12 minutes, it came out (and printed) great.