Thank you)) I am glad to meet you.Looks very good Sergey, congratulations! Those exposure times are nice and short, which is probably helped by the short distance between the light source and the print. I think you've shown very nicely that a perfectly functional unit can be constructed at a low budget and with great simplicity.
thanks a lot for the link. very glad that my experience helped you. I am currently building a new large plant with a vacuum system and more advanced controls. Your link will be very useful in your work. Thank you.Congratulations, Sergey, the lights are just awesome. Nice job. I want to make a similar installation. So I have already ordered some led lights from aliexpress. Unfortunately, my previous package with LED lights got lost. But this time I got it safe and very fast. All due to my new discovery- these great tips- https://alitools.io/en/blog/warning-tips-and-checklist-to-avoid-scams-on-aliexpress/ so if you shop online often please check the article. it was very useful for me.
He wrote “alternative photography”. That’s a hell of a lot of things.Like he said, alt process prints. Cyanotypes, carbon transfer, salted paper, kallitype, pt/pd, gum, etc etc
What do you use such a UV unit for?
Contact prints I presume?
The cyano types?
Tinted negatives with UV information (pyro, selenium etc.)?
I’d love to see some examples when you feel like it.I constantly practice the following printing methods: oilprint, carbon transfer, kallitype, cyano. Gradually moving towards the copper photo engraving. There is practically no market for related products in Ukraine. You have to invent something yourself. My wife has mastered oilprint very well and she really likes it. in any case, we now buy twice as much paper)))
Halogen is phenomenally inefficient if you use it to make UV. I'm not surprised UV leds would be two orders of magnitude faster per Watt dissipation.I use a 1000W halogen exposure table
Halogen is phenomenally inefficient if you use it to make UV. I'm not surprised UV leds would be two orders of magnitude faster per Watt dissipation.
But your halogen (or is it actually HMI??) is a point source. With your thicker carbon tissues, a diffuse light source such as Sergey's is NOT a good idea. You'll run into a couple of problems with it, of the unresolvable kind as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?