4season
Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 1,981
- Format
- Plastic Cameras
Former broadcast television guy here: No, it's not bad, and I can see where you took some pains to light yourself and find a sort of background (am a bit ambivalent about said background though as it's only partial, and totally unrelated to photography)
Opening animation is mercifully brief as it should be: Many people go overboard with theirs, but it quickly becomes tedious to the viewer after watching a few episodes.
Got CG (character generator): If so, use it. Don't just say what the topic of the video will be, reinforce it with CG.
Where I get antsy is that for more than two minutes, it's a single stationary camera fixed on you, and you're not really taking advantage of what the medium can offer: Don't just say it, show it! For instance:
At around 00:35, you hold up a box of RPX25 which is great, but I'd then want to immediately cut to product shots of said film, as you are describing it.
01:20 you start to describe lack of mid-tones, wish you would cut away to an example photo(s) which shows this. But don't reveal too much about your feelings yet: Give viewers a reason to stick around to the conclusion.
When you finally do cut away to your photos, the pacing is alright, but it's okay to go on talking if there's some qualities you'd like to point out to your viewers.
At 4:23 it's back to you for the conclusion, and this the part most viewers have been waiting for. Not really the best place to drop in asides about 35 mm vs 120 or the state of your scanner. What people really want to know is whether you consider it a "thumbs up", "thumbs down" or something else.
Opening animation is mercifully brief as it should be: Many people go overboard with theirs, but it quickly becomes tedious to the viewer after watching a few episodes.
Got CG (character generator): If so, use it. Don't just say what the topic of the video will be, reinforce it with CG.
Where I get antsy is that for more than two minutes, it's a single stationary camera fixed on you, and you're not really taking advantage of what the medium can offer: Don't just say it, show it! For instance:
At around 00:35, you hold up a box of RPX25 which is great, but I'd then want to immediately cut to product shots of said film, as you are describing it.
01:20 you start to describe lack of mid-tones, wish you would cut away to an example photo(s) which shows this. But don't reveal too much about your feelings yet: Give viewers a reason to stick around to the conclusion.
When you finally do cut away to your photos, the pacing is alright, but it's okay to go on talking if there's some qualities you'd like to point out to your viewers.
At 4:23 it's back to you for the conclusion, and this the part most viewers have been waiting for. Not really the best place to drop in asides about 35 mm vs 120 or the state of your scanner. What people really want to know is whether you consider it a "thumbs up", "thumbs down" or something else.