My inexpensive UV light box (fluorescent)

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,076
Messages
2,785,878
Members
99,797
Latest member
nishanaashref
Recent bookmarks
0

keithostertag

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
597
Location
Louisville,
Format
Multi Format
This is my recent build of a UV light box. I decided I did not need an enclosure, and made this as open as possible to allow heat dissipation without the need for a fan. I use this in a darkroom so there are no issues with stray UV from outside, and I always wear UV eye protection (less than $3 at any big box home store).

I suppose some would say an enclosure might provide better exposure power by reflecting more light downward, but in my case I feel that isn’t necessary- my exposures for cyanotype have been 3 minutes and nothing in this unit ever gets hot.

I used whatever wood scraps I had around. The basic frame is made of standard 1x4’s and a few narrow strips. I mounted each tombstone pair on its own length of 1x1 then positioned them to bring each bulb as close to each other as possible (without touching). This seems to provide even lighting, though I haven’t tested this thoroughly. I used whatever woods screws available, pre-drilling the holes.

The frame was built to accommodate a vintage contact printing frame which measures approx 13x16. The clearance from the bottom of the fluorescent tubes to the surface of the contact frame is about 1.5 inches.

I already owned the 8 GE F15T8/BL tubes from a past project, but I see they are still available online for about $6 each. The shunted tombstones from eBay cost around $20 including postage. The two ballasts I bought online for about $15 each, and their integrated wires were long enough that I needed no additional wire or wire nuts.

I used a terminal block to connect a power cord and use an external surge protector strip for a switch. I did not connect a ground- there doesn’t appear to be any reason for grounding or shielding anything as in the old days of using magnetic ballasts with starters. I get no sound and no flickering. I have not seen evidence that pre-warming the tubes before exposure provides any benefits.

Total weight is about 8.5 pounds. I currently am working on 5x7 or 6x9 cyanotypes, but I could easily do 8x10’s or add another ballast and a few more bulbs if I wanted to go a little larger.

uv_box_1870.jpg


uv_box_1874.jpg


uv_box_1873.jpg


uv_box_1872.jpg
 
OP
OP

keithostertag

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
597
Location
Louisville,
Format
Multi Format
Hi Peter- the unit does not get hot, as was already stated. Why do you suggest I put a fan in?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,241
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
It can be as simple as this! One thing I would change: leave about half an inch / one centimeter of space between the individual tubes. The way you have mounted them now, the tubes will heat up unevenly (creating local hot spots/strips where they touch each other) and that's probably going to reduce their service life. There's no big penalty (in terms of exposure time, evenness etc) to separating them by a small margin. Increase the distance between the light source and the print a little if you get darker bands across the print. Something like 4" between the tubes and the print is usually sufficient with tubes spaced at around half na inch.
I'd also cover up that terminal block in the last photo with a piece of scrap wood to prevent accidentally grasping it when lifting the frame. Evidently your device would fail any kind of even the most lax security assessment, and that might be acceptable for a DIY contraption that only you will use, but I wouldn't make matters worse than they should be, to be honest.

No fan...you should put one in
It's completely unnecessary. I run a larger bank of tubes mounted to the underside of a table with limited possibilities for convection. Works fine, and has been working fine for years, also for exposures up to an hour. With an open setup as shown here a fan isn't required in the least.
 
OP
OP

keithostertag

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
597
Location
Louisville,
Format
Multi Format
Thank you koraks. Yes, I wondered if there might be some problem with them being so close together. As of yet I have not noticed any banding due to the short tube-to-print distance. And yea, since I don't have pets or children around so I don't fear the exposure of the terminal block, but covering it is on the agenda :smile:
 

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,172
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
I just bought a nice Led lamp from 1000bulbs.com
I lost the Url but it is 19 inches across; round and made by pltsolutions.com
equivalent to 5200K
even has a dimmer option already wired...no more bulbs for me!!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom