Good luck on your trip.
I'm preparing for a trip where I'm bringing the Medium format(s) and today did an inventory, as to maybe order a bit extra.
106 rolls (equivalent as there are 5 of 220). 72 of color and 36 of B&W. Fun fact, I had a shipping box from my last photo order, 28x20x16cm, that I used to check the volume for luggage. All the film fits and fills that box, which is an interesting coincidence. The total weight is ~3.10kg
About frozen film, a lot of that is expired 2022, some Provia expired 2020 and I just saved it during the pandemic. The rest is 2023-24 expired because it was bought in the timeframe before the last significant price increases last year. I bought to freeze and in general (all film is ISO100-400) it should be well performing moderately past this period.
As long as you keep them in the freezer - all your movies are new
400 and faster deteriorate in the freezer just as well. They remain fast films, stored cold or not. This means they're just better at capturing background radiation, and a freezer does very little about that.
and film speed has not dropped at all.
I'm glad to hear your positive experience with this specific film. My experience with fast film has been different; pretty much all of it turned to unusable mush after a decade.
You mean, it didn't slow even further down since it left the factory at a snail's pace?
Sorry, couldn't resist... (*)
I'm glad to hear your positive experience with this specific film. My experience with fast film has been different; pretty much all of it turned to unusable mush after a decade.
(*) To clarify, I've often expressed myself critically about Foma 400 and my opinion remains largely the same on its various issues. However, I've also come to appreciate it a little more recently; my niece has been shooting quite a bit of this (living in a metropole and raising a toddler doesn't do much good for one's budget, so it's pretty much all she can afford) and I have to say it does interesting things to caucasian skin tones. I can see its applicability especially in that area.
I'm preparing for a trip where I'm bringing the Medium format(s) and today did an inventory, as to maybe order a bit extra.
106 rolls (equivalent as there are 5 of 220). 72 of color and 36 of B&W
What about color negative and color positive film?
Thanks for the good travel wishes. It seems abstract to do the "medium format expedition" after so long. There is a certain hilarity in seeing the volume of it in a box, but the Texas Leicas can eat through film quickly so better having as much. I will prepare this weekend by removing it out of the packaging (still in wrapper for humidity) and try to cram it into the large backpack.Wow, I thought I was extreme bringing 30 rolls on a 3-week trip! You'd get some sarcastic comments for sure if you tried to hand-check that through American security.
That much? Interesting. I have kept at most Portra 400 for 3 years after expiration (2020), and doing hybrid color and scans I did notice some grames tended to appear more underexposed than they should (fog?) and then a bit of granularity. The latter of which is rather anecdotical as it is 6x9.ilms tend to build a stop or more of fog per year, and the toe of the curve gets eaten at the same rate with grain going up and color shifting around on the color film. Sure, I've gotten acceptable prints and scans from 20-year old Superia 200 - although 15 year old HP5+, not so much; it's just very limited in its applicability. But if you scan, twist some curves and are OK with grain going up, then I suppose you could call it alright.
Portra 400 (also 160) in 120 I have had particularly disappointing experiences with since the backing paper on the outside of the roll easily prints through onto the film, making the first 2 frames unusable. It's hit & miss, but I've happened it a little too often to use it confidently once out of date.I have kept at most Portra 400 [...] 6x9.
Thanks for the good travel wishes. It seems abstract to do the "medium format expedition" after so long. There is a certain hilarity in seeing the volume of it in a box, but the Texas Leicas can eat through film quickly so better having as much. I will prepare this weekend by removing it out of the packaging (still in wrapper for humidity) and try to cram it into the large backpack.
Actually found a couple BW rolls in the fridge and one HP5 exp 2023 that I have travelled around (some Xray exposures). Might as well carry the cameras loaded and if they are CT scanned, so that is, if not I have a couple more rolls.
Another point is the crazy amounts I see people on local classifieds and auction sites for old expired film. And sometimes I wonder how people are still getting decent results out of old 800, 1600 (Superias, Neopan) and 3200 film. Myself don't seek any of these expired.
I would extend that to all non-refrigerated 120, and specially past expiration. The ink transfer thankfully has not happened to me in the 2020 frozen batches, but some sort of mottling has exhibited to various degrees. Very slightly on the frozen portra, and quite a bit on some expired Foma and Delta.Portra 400 (also 160) in 120 I have had particularly disappointing experiences with since the backing paper on the outside of the roll easily prints through onto the film, making the first 2 frames unusable. It's hit & miss, but I've happened it a little too often to use it confidently once out of date.
I would extend that to all non-refrigerated 120, and specially past expiration.
I wish for 220 for these situations, an advantage is that it does not have the backing paper so no mottling or transfer. And as of 220, I see some pro photographers finishing off their stocks which are now... 6 year old expired at least! Guess that they look good because it is offset at the scanning editing stage. I am carrying 5 rolls 220 160NS which I bought 2016, expired 2018 for this very purpose. I enjoy film photography but foresee that it will be a chore reloading often.Good luck on the trip! All medium format on my last one was 220, and that saved me space, reloading time, and bringing a 120 insert, but I understand that can be limiting depending on your aims. I was on the go most of the time so 120 would have slowed me down and bored my travel companion. 30 shots on a 645, almost like shooting 35mm!
I don't think people are generally getting good results on most of the expired film you see for sale, the main market is people new to film photography that want to try things and don't realize or care what kind of a hit their images will take. I buy expired film in batches and rarely ever in 120 because of the backing paper issue. After a while you get a sense for which films expire the best - Koraks is right that Portra is one of the worst in that regard. I never buy expired Portra anymore.
Thanks Nicholas. I wish they would bring back 126 Cartridge film. It was square frames with a wierd sprocket spacing pattern. I had a Kodak 126 camera with a Schneider lens that I have since sold because I couldnt get film for it. I would have really liked to try that camera. I think it was a Kodak 500, iirc. I still have my dads childhood camera as well, Kodak Instamatic 404, would be fun to shoot it and add the negatives to my dads ancient negative that I still have.
For 22 years expired film the results look pretty good. Are these "straight" scans or have you corrected them? Do the negatives have normal density or would they benefit from extra exposure? Portra has enough latitude for a couple of stops extra exposure (much more actually if you are daring).The first Portra I have ever bought was bought here, expired 2003
I can't notice any obvious crossover
Red shadows, cyan highlights. Present in both images. I find it hard to miss, really.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?