Multigrade Filters on Omega D3

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 0
  • 0
  • 48
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 116
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 122
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 8
  • 295

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,746
Messages
2,780,298
Members
99,693
Latest member
lachanalia
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
219
Location
Potomac, MD
Format
Medium Format
I'm just getting set up to do my own printing, and I have an Omega D3 that is just about ready to go. From what I can tell, the only thing I lack is some way of using contrast filters. It doesn't look like there's a filter holder or any provision for one.

I've seen this post, #9. But, I'm wondering, instead of doing below-the-lens filtering, wouldn't it be more direct to put one of these Ilford 6x6 gels on top of the negative? Is there any downside to doing it one way or the other? If I just put the gel on top of the negative, do I run the risk of wrinkling it and ruining it?
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,676
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Do you have the variable condenser head or a single condenser head? I have a D3 with variable condense head, I insert 6 X 6 filters above or below the top condenser depending on the position of the condenser. Putting the filter on top of the negative should work as well.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,646
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I'm just getting set up to do my own printing, and I have an Omega D3 that is just about ready to go. From what I can tell, the only thing I lack is some way of using contrast filters. It doesn't look like there's a filter holder or any provision for one.

I've seen this post, #9. But, I'm wondering, instead of doing below-the-lens filtering, wouldn't it be more direct to put one of these Ilford 6x6 gels on top of the negative? Is there any downside to doing it one way or the other? If I just put the gel on top of the negative, do I run the risk of wrinkling it and ruining it?
Don't worry about below the lens filtering.It's a perfect way of doing things as long as you keep the filters dust free.
 
OP
OP
focus_on_infinity
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
219
Location
Potomac, MD
Format
Medium Format
Do you have the variable condenser head or a single condenser head? I have a D3 with variable condense head, I insert 6 X 6 filters above or below the top condenser depending on the position of the condenser. Putting the filter on top of the negative should work as well.

I have two, a large one and a smaller one, but neither seem to be adjustible in any way.

Also, if I'm doing larger prints, does it make sense to increase the bulb to a 150W?
 
Last edited:

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,676
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Seems like you have the condensers one for 4X5 the other for MF and 35mm, the viable condenser head looks like this. The front is hinged and opens up so that the top condenser can be moved depending on which lens is being used.

s-l640.jpg
 

Deleted member 88956

Filters work just fine between lens and easel. No need to overthink this.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,676
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I would use below the lens filters, less trouble to pop one in and out in a filter carrier than lifting the upper stage to swap out filters, but a set of under the lens filters is double what a 6X6 set costs.
 
OP
OP
focus_on_infinity
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
219
Location
Potomac, MD
Format
Medium Format
I would use below the lens filters, less trouble to pop one in and out in a filter carrier than lifting the upper stage to swap out filters, but a set of under the lens filters is double what a 6X6 set costs.

I found an assembly that goes between the condenser and the lamp for $dirt that has a drawer for a 5" or so filter. I've seen some pictures that seem to indicate that it will fit on the head that I have. I think that should probably work.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,676
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I've seen those, I think it will work and if inexpensive well worth a try. In the long run I would consider an upgrade to a variable condense or color head. If you haven't seen this here is is a list of parts for the D3.

http://www.khbphotografix.com/omega/Enlargers/D3.htm

KHBphoto out of Canada has many parts for the Omega D series, you want to contact him to what he recommends.
http://www.khbphotografix.com
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,672
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
I have a D3 too, and I just put the filter (15x15cm) atop the condenser, as that door opens so easily, and a 0.3 density filter to stretch the exposure time so I have enough time for dodging and burning..
 
OP
OP
focus_on_infinity
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
219
Location
Potomac, MD
Format
Medium Format
I have a D3 too, and I just put the filter (15x15cm) atop the condenser, as that door opens so easily, and a 0.3 density filter to stretch the exposure time so I have enough time for dodging and burning..

I got my 6x6 Ilford filters last week, and I've found that doing that works perfectly. They're more rigid than I had thought, so they're fine just sitting under the condenser.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom