Most reliable manual focus Minolta bodies

Deleted member 88956

Yet the R3 (XE) is considered to be Leicas least reliable model, followed by the R4 (XD).
Because R3 is not XE in much deeper sense than stated prism and spot meter. And it were the electronics that took R3 down, not mechanics.

R4 was apparently closer electronically to XD and both had issues. Leica fixed its problems in later production R4, while Minolta dropped XD for X line with a completely new, cheaper, but reliable design.
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,413
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format
Isn't that what an SrT-200 is?
I don't have one but I think the srT-200 is lacking the shutter speed in the viewfinder. That's based on the description on the Rokkor Files web site. The differences all seem very slight to me but they must have had a marketing reason to make so many variations of the same basic camera. I'm sure the reliability of the low end ones are no different than models with more options. Maybe the low end ones are more reliable since they have less that can go wrong with them.
 

russell_w_b

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2018
Messages
92
Location
Penrith
Format
Multi Format
I don't have one but I think the srT-200 ...

Ah... Didn’t think of that, but yes. No shutter info visible through viewfinder. I note that with the bottom plate off the mechanics look similar to the Sr-1V but one of the gears is plastic on the Sr-t 200.

Pretty solid construction though.
__
R.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,923
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,192
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
I have the 202.
Do you know, is there much difference..... i suppose that all depends on how important a certain feature is to a person..... between the 200, 201 and 202.?
Thank You
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,777
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format

Thanks a lot! I did a fair amount of searching but somehow missed these and eventually gave up.
 

russell_w_b

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2018
Messages
92
Location
Penrith
Format
Multi Format
I have the 202.
Do you know, is there much difference..... i suppose that all depends on how important a certain feature is to a person..... between the 200, 201 and 202.?
Thank You

The 200 has no self timer whereas the 201 has. And, as mentioned, the 201 has shutter speed info visible through the viewfinder. The 202 comes in black and chrome and has an offset pentaprism as well as full viewfinder info. I think it was aimed at the professional tog. And it has a film memo holder on the back to stick the top of your HP5+ card in or whatever.

Not only are there these variants but, as I've learned, there are sub-variants of models! There's a 200 model a and model b, for example. different focussing screens and plastic things instead of metal. I suppose it's like buying a car. Do you go for the DL, the E, the L, the DL, the GT, the GTI? They'll all get you there in the end.
--

R.
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,192
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Got it..... thanks
 

Helge

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
3,938
Location
Denmark
Format
Medium Format
The most reliable Minolta is the wrong question to ask.
SR-T is the most reliable one, in the sense that it’s a best bestseller and you can pick and chose. It’s also very solidly build and mechanical, so if it was stored right in the last 40 to 50 years it will probably work.

But it’s not the best experience in lot of senses (not that it’s a bad camera).

The light meter is also likely to be off or non-functioning, and it’s slow and not very precise at the extremes (where metering matters).
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…