Mona Lisa

[RobC]

Not about photography but interesting how scan of painting revealed a lot of unknown stuff about it.

If you're not in the UK you will probably need to use an UK based http proxy to watch this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06ryn6l/secrets-of-the-mona-lisa

 

[cliveh]

Not about photography but interesting how scan of painting revealed a lot of unknown stuff about it.

If you're not in the UK you will probably need to use an UK based http proxy to watch this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06ryn6l/secrets-of-the-mona-lisa

It was a very interesting programme and I was also pleased to see that Andrew was using a film camera. Obviously a man of integrity.

 

[RobC]

Rather than a scan, its actually a new photographic technique of photographing the painting using a range of lighting colours to show up differences below the surface of the painting.

 

[Sirius Glass]

The multispectrial approach includes infrared and ultraviolet. Or as some say ultraviolent.

 

[RobC]

Link content is not accessible to members outside the UK.

ahem, did you read the post?

 

[AgX]

Yes, as usual after posting my comment...

Anyway, as some or many or most members do not have such disguising technologies it would have interesting to learn what that video is about.

 

[John51]

L de V: I've finished your portrait hon.

ML: You've made look so skinny! I HATE YOU!

L de V: Don't worry hon, I'll fix it in post.

 

[jeffreyg]

I didn't watch the video but I'm sure they missed this.
(fun with a picture of one of my granddaughters)



http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/

 

[removed account4]

I didn't watch the video but I'm sure they missed this.
(fun with a picture of one of my granddaughters)

View attachment 121114

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/

WHEW ! for a second there, i thought that was what was revealed under the outer coats of paint
( mr peabody was right ! )

 

[Theo Sulphate]

I must be the only person on the planet that doesn't see anything special about the Mona Lisa - yes, I know you're supposed to look indirectly at the smile. It's an ok painting, but at least it's better than any Picasso.

Monet - there's a great painter.

 

[gzhuang]

Smells like Deja Vu?

 

[Theo Sulphate]

Великий человек Владимир Путин!

 

[Old-N-Feeble]

That's just... spooky.

 

[Nathan King]

I must be the only person on the planet that doesn't see anything special about the Mona Lisa - yes, I know you're supposed to look indirectly at the smile. It's an ok painting, but at least it's better than any Picasso.

Monet - there's a great painter.

Have you seen it in person? Reproductions do it absolutely no justice.

 

[RobC]

The day I went to the Louvre a very very long time ago, turned out to be the only day of the year it was closed back then.

So has it got some 3D pop?

 

[MattKing]

https://youtu.be/NIDX18Xl16s

 

[Theo Sulphate]

Have you seen it in person? Reproductions do it absolutely no justice.

I have not. Is it in a dark area and people kept a good distance away?

https://youtu.be/NIDX18Xl16s

Beautiful.

 

[Nathan King]

I have not. Is it in a dark area and people kept a good distance away?



Beautiful.

It's well out of reach behind really thick bullet proof glass.

 

[Theo Sulphate]

It's well out of reach behind really thick bullet proof glass.

Is it lit reasonably well?

I'm certain flash photography is prohibited; any chance of non-flash photography being allowed?

Actually, what I'd really love to photograph is the Rosetta Stone in the British Museum.

 

[Nathan King]

Is it lit reasonably well?

I'm certain flash photography is prohibited; any chance of non-flash photography being allowed?

Actually, what I'd really love to photograph is the Rosetta Stone in the British Museum.

It is lit fairly well considering most museum lighting. You may take photographs of it without flash. This was ten years ago.

 

[RobC]

how do you stop people with phones from using flash? You just can't. I expect that what you see is not the real thing.

 

[Sirius Glass]

In the past museums, churches and public building could limit photographs. But now everyone seems to have a cell phone with a camera, and no one can stop them from photographing and photographing with flash.

 

[Nathan King]

how do you stop people with phones from using flash? You just can't. I expect that what you see is not the real thing.

I'm not that cynical. I think the glass would filter out damaging intensities or wavelengths of light. Flash is probably frowned upon more because it spoils the viewing experience than to prevent damage to the art, but I'll admit I've never spoken with an art conservator.