minolta shoe size

Barbara

A
Barbara

  • 2
  • 2
  • 107
The nights are dark and empty

A
The nights are dark and empty

  • 11
  • 5
  • 154
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

H
Nymphaea's, triple exposure

  • 0
  • 0
  • 75
Nymphaea

H
Nymphaea

  • 1
  • 0
  • 62

Forum statistics

Threads
198,933
Messages
2,783,408
Members
99,750
Latest member
Sellenlarger8S!
Recent bookmarks
0

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Sorry...cannot remember the exact name for the wireless Flash Triggers.
Is it YunGo.......something like that.?
They fit my Canon FD cameras just fine, but my Minolta XD and 202 do not want them. MAYBE it is just a tighter fit, but i really do not want to shove any harder than i am now.
Any of you guys have experience with this.?
Thank You
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
The shoes are(should be) a standard size since the 30's.
The new AF Minoltas went to a male camera mount though.

Have you adjusted the locking screw fully out of contact with
the shoe when you put it on?
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,954
Location
UK
Format
35mm
As above, all Minolta shoes for flash are the same - an agreed industry standard - until the advent of the 2nd generation of Autofocus cameras when they changed to Minolta's own unique design. (Heaven only knows why!)
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,380
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Why? Because after Minolta bought Konica they did everything they could think of to screw up their camera sales. Ask my daughter who worked for them.
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Sorry...user error.:sad:
It was not the locking screw, but the spring loaded pins on the device.
Maybe the Canons have a more gradual slope or something.?
Anyway, the last row of pins was not being pushed all the way up into the wireless unit, and that was prohibiting getting it the last 1mm into the shoe.
Afraid it was just a case of Beginner/Inexperience on my part. Did not see it until i put the camera upside-down, and took a look with a decent light.
Thanks Guys
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,822
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
As above, all Minolta shoes for flash are the same - an agreed industry standard - until the advent of the 2nd generation of Autofocus cameras when they changed to Minolta's own unique design. (Heaven only knows why!)
Why? Because the hot shoe as we know it although now adopted by ISO it was invented to mount a small viewfinder and not a big heavy flash unit.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,954
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Why? Because the hot shoe as we know it although now adopted by ISO it was invented to mount a small viewfinder and not a big heavy flash unit.

I have used a few Minolta cameras with various flash units and I have never found them to be 'heavy'. Top heavy perhaps but there has never been a problem with actual weight. The really large flashes such as the Metz ct 1 to 5 models were never mounted actually on the camera.
 

cooltouch

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
1,677
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Multi Format
I have a NEX 7 and I hate the damned thing. I bought a couple of adapters that take it from the Minolta proprietary mount to ISO standard with a Canon TTL layout regarding contact pins. Unfortunately my Canon TTL flashes don't provide TTL exposure with it. No surprise there. I use the adapters now mostly for off-camera flash use.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom