Paul Howell
Subscriber
Thing is, pros need pro bodies.
We are not pros.
Long term reliability is not even necessarily a requirement for pros. Serviceability and reparability is.
One example is the F3 LCD where Nikon advised a replacement after a number of years.
Just go with the one you like and that works.
If I had to chose only two 135 SLR MF bodies from any brand it would be X-700 and XD-7.
For what little it’s worth I have avoided the LX because of rumors of flakiness and impossibility of repair.
I might be very wrong though.
The Canon EOS 1V is still being serviced by Canon, (although someone posted on another site that cameras needed to be sent to Japan) and Nikon is servicing the F6 for the new few years. Otherwise Leica, Hasselblad have reliable techs, all others, it is a crap shoot. Unless someone is willing to pay for a machine shop to make a part, a K 1000 is no more repairble than a LX. I have 3 Minolta A9000, 2 800si, 2 9Xi and a 9, I will shoot them until the die, I will have them CLA, new seals if needed but if one breaks it breaks and I will more on. BTW, has anyone had a machine shop made a part?