Ralph Javins
Member
Good morning, Denmark;
Perhaps now I can speak on the subject of the Minolta Hi-Matic 7s. As justification for my claim, I point out that now I also have the Minolta Hi-Matic 7s II, which I believe is closely related.
My reaction after almost two weeks and two rolls of film (with a third in the camera now) is that this is a very nice smaller camera. I like the prints I have received so far. It is almost pocket size, but not quite. The Rollie 35 may still hold the title in that category. However . . .
My point of reference for cameras of this type is the Minolta Hi-Matic 9. I find that the wider range of shutter speeds on the 9 really helps in varying lighting conditions. While the shutter speed on the 7s II goes down to only 1/15 of a second, if you are only hand-holding the camera, that is not a problem. But, if you want to use it on a tripod or just set it on a table and trigger the shutter with the self timer, you might not be able to get some of those "fading light" photographs. The additional weight and the larger size of the 9 body fits my hands better. The lens is only a 40 mm on my 7s II; my preferred focal length for a 35 mm camera is still 58 mm, so 40 mm is farther away than the 45 mm on the 9.
Will I keep the Minolta Hi-Matic 7s II? Yes, I will. I do like the smaller size and lighter weight for some applications, such as in my pack, where it will perform well under most common conditions.
Perhaps that is why I have more than one camera.
Perhaps now I can speak on the subject of the Minolta Hi-Matic 7s. As justification for my claim, I point out that now I also have the Minolta Hi-Matic 7s II, which I believe is closely related.
My reaction after almost two weeks and two rolls of film (with a third in the camera now) is that this is a very nice smaller camera. I like the prints I have received so far. It is almost pocket size, but not quite. The Rollie 35 may still hold the title in that category. However . . .
My point of reference for cameras of this type is the Minolta Hi-Matic 9. I find that the wider range of shutter speeds on the 9 really helps in varying lighting conditions. While the shutter speed on the 7s II goes down to only 1/15 of a second, if you are only hand-holding the camera, that is not a problem. But, if you want to use it on a tripod or just set it on a table and trigger the shutter with the self timer, you might not be able to get some of those "fading light" photographs. The additional weight and the larger size of the 9 body fits my hands better. The lens is only a 40 mm on my 7s II; my preferred focal length for a 35 mm camera is still 58 mm, so 40 mm is farther away than the 45 mm on the 9.
Will I keep the Minolta Hi-Matic 7s II? Yes, I will. I do like the smaller size and lighter weight for some applications, such as in my pack, where it will perform well under most common conditions.
Perhaps that is why I have more than one camera.