Minolta Autocord lever.

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,022
Messages
2,784,797
Members
99,779
Latest member
Deezfluffybutternutz
Recent bookmarks
0

Chrismat

Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
1,286
Location
Brewer, Maine
Format
Multi Format
I just mailed my recently obtained Autocord (the second one I've owned, I foolishly sold my first) to Karl Bryan for some work. The focusing lever is fine as the focusing itself, but I happened to come upon a website that makes replacements. If you go to Shapeways.com and enter 'Minolta Autocord' you'll see that they sell replacements. 3D printing factories are going to make it possible to make hard to find parts for a lot of things, assuming of course, if there is a market.
 
Last edited:

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,902
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Interesting. I wonder how good the printing is. I've seen some real junk from 3d printers and some real quality.

Installation will still be a problem if the set screw holes aren't part of the printing.
 
OP
OP
Chrismat

Chrismat

Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
1,286
Location
Brewer, Maine
Format
Multi Format
Yes. A few years ago with my first Autocord, I found a seller on Ebay who made actually made one them himself (but not anymore). I bought this last one, and it was so much nicer than the original, very strong. The set screws were perfect. The problem was the lever hugged the camera body closer than the original, those silver (decorative only?) things under the focusing lever blocked the new lever. I sent the camera to Dean Williams in Idaho who used to work on cameras and he was able to machine away the parts that were in the way.

I always wondered why Minolta never upgraded the lever back in the day, they must have been breaking when the camera was in production.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,902
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
I wonder if the lever was meant as a "fuse" of some sort? Meaning that it was designed to break before more severe damage was done to the camera? That is really the only way I can make any sense of the material, and even then it doesn't make sense to me WHY they wanted a fuse in the design.
 

JW PHOTO

Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
1,148
Location
Lake, Michig
Format
Medium Format
The focusing lever issues was a problem that really started cropping up well after the Autocords production had ended. I'll admit the focus lever is not the Hammer of Thor, but worked just fine while the cameras were young. The main problem for the Autocord, as well as 100's of other cameras from that time slot, was the focusing helicals lubricant. Especially when the cameras were not used. The dried lubricant would not allow the helical to do its job and the owner who would try to make it do its job ended up rendering his fantastic Autocord useless. How do I know this? Because it happened to me probably 20 years ago, which was before I became familiar with the common camera term called "DON'T FUKING FORCE IT STUPID".
 
OP
OP
Chrismat

Chrismat

Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
1,286
Location
Brewer, Maine
Format
Multi Format
That's a good point. The older stiff lubricant would make the lever vulnerable to breaking whereas when it was newer there wouldn't be any resistance.
 
OP
OP
Chrismat

Chrismat

Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
1,286
Location
Brewer, Maine
Format
Multi Format
I also e-mailed Karl Bryan about the replacement from Shapeways.com, and he responded by saying he couldn't see the set screws on the one displayed on the web page. I just checked the site again, and I couldn't see the screws either.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom