Minilab chemistry for C-41/E-6/ECN-2 bleaching & fixing, but developing & stabilizing as well - possible?

GOLD Award

A
GOLD Award

  • 3
  • 2
  • 40
Orotone - Como Tree

Orotone - Como Tree

  • 1
  • 0
  • 30
Orotone - Industrial

H
Orotone - Industrial

  • 0
  • 0
  • 26
Pink roses

A
Pink roses

  • 0
  • 0
  • 28

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,212
Messages
2,803,593
Members
100,163
Latest member
Rickydup
Recent bookmarks
0

abrakafocus

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2025
Messages
5
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Format
Medium Format
Hey y’all! Hope everyone’s doing well.

I’ve been searching through Photrio for some time, but I’ve only found fragmented answers or isolated discussions — mostly without any visible results (please correct me if I’m wrong).

My question is: Is it possible to use Minilab RA-4 chemistry for C-41, E-6, or ECN-2 film processes — not only for bleaching and fixing, but also for developing and stabilizing?

I have a Kodak Flexicolor LORR LU Developer Replenisher with the matching Starter, but I’m struggling to source the bleach (BL) and fixer (FX) components. They’re hard to find, which is why I’m wondering:

Can Minilab RA-4 chemistry substitute for C-41 / E-6 / ECN-2 bleaching, fixing, developing, or stabilizing steps?

Any insights or experience with compatible substitutes would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! 🙂
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,635
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Welcome to Photrio!

Is it possible to use Minilab RA-4 chemistry for C-41, E-6, or ECN-2 film processes — not only for bleaching and fixing, but also for developing and stabilizing?

Simple answer: no.

W.r.t. bleaching & fixing: paper and film are very different in terms of silver content and the nature of this silver content, which very strongly affects the type of bleach and fix needed as well as the process conditions. Between C41&ECN2 film and E6 there are also distinct differences. ECN2 and C41 film are fairly comparable in this regard.

W.r.t. development: while you will get an image if you cross process everything in the same developer, the results will be poor even if you experimentally determine processing parameters (time & temperature) that yield the best compromise. It'll still be, well, crap.

There are some ways in which you could simplify the chemistry setup. For instance, you could technically speaking use a C41 fixer for C41, ECN2, E6 film and RA4 paper (if you run the paper through a non-standard bleach-then-fix process instead of a regular blix process). You could likewise use a C41 bleach for ECN2 film as well as RA4 paper, and possibly also for E6 film (you may have to adjust bleach time for the latter). You can cross-process ECN2 film in C41 developer and vice versa, and some people find the results OK - I personally don't agree as the results are very much sub-bar. But if you only scan your film and don't intend to optically print it, you may be able to sort of get away with it (but it's a compromise).

The simple answer is that if you want good results, you should use the specific chemistry intended for the film/paper.
 
OP
OP
abrakafocus

abrakafocus

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2025
Messages
5
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Format
Medium Format
Welcome to Photrio!



Simple answer: no.

W.r.t. bleaching & fixing: paper and film are very different in terms of silver content and the nature of this silver content, which very strongly affects the type of bleach and fix needed as well as the process conditions. Between C41&ECN2 film and E6 there are also distinct differences. ECN2 and C41 film are fairly comparable in this regard.

W.r.t. development: while you will get an image if you cross process everything in the same developer, the results will be poor even if you experimentally determine processing parameters (time & temperature) that yield the best compromise. It'll still be, well, crap.

There are some ways in which you could simplify the chemistry setup. For instance, you could technically speaking use a C41 fixer for C41, ECN2, E6 film and RA4 paper (if you run the paper through a non-standard bleach-then-fix process instead of a regular blix process). You could likewise use a C41 bleach for ECN2 film as well as RA4 paper, and possibly also for E6 film (you may have to adjust bleach time for the latter). You can cross-process ECN2 film in C41 developer and vice versa, and some people find the results OK - I personally don't agree as the results are very much sub-bar. But if you only scan your film and don't intend to optically print it, you may be able to sort of get away with it (but it's a compromise).

The simple answer is that if you want good results, you should use the specific chemistry intended for the film/paper.

Thank you for the confirmation! I was expecting this kind of answer; I just needed a bit of justification. Small kits are used up quickly, and moving to anything bigger than a Jobo is costly—so, sadly, that’s the story. Achieving great results remains the priority, of course. Cheers!

Just one more question: since RA-4 BL/FX baths are not an option, is it possible to use Fuji Environeg C41-RA Bleach or Tetenal Ergoline C-41 RA Bleachbath with an alternative fixer in small rotary systems? Thanks!
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,635
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Well, that's what they're intended for, so sure. At least for C41 and it will also work for ECN2 (I use Fuji EnviroNeg bleach for both). Bleach times may be longer for E6 and there can be additional caveats. With E6, you may need to add an extra stabilizer step (not a C41 final rinse, which is not truly a stabilizer) if the stabilizer is part of the bleach bath. I guess that would depend on the rest of the E6 process you're running, so it's more difficult to comment.
 
OP
OP
abrakafocus

abrakafocus

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2025
Messages
5
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Format
Medium Format
Well, that's what they're intended for, so sure. At least for C41 and it will also work for ECN2 (I use Fuji EnviroNeg bleach for both). Bleach times may be longer for E6 and there can be additional caveats. With E6, you may need to add an extra stabilizer step (not a C41 final rinse, which is not truly a stabilizer) if the stabilizer is part of the bleach bath. I guess that would depend on the rest of the E6 process you're running, so it's more difficult to comment.

That’s great to hear, really! I’m currently deciding between two options: a Tetenal Ergoline C41-RA 5L Bleachbath kit (an older warehouse batch for around 40 €) or a new Fuji EnviroNeg Bleach for about 110 €. Unfortunately, I haven’t found any fixer available at the moment.


How do you usually dilute (or mix) the Fuji EnviroNeg? I typically prepare small batches of about 0.5 L. Hope I'm not asking too much. Thanks!
 
OP
OP
abrakafocus

abrakafocus

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2025
Messages
5
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
Format
Medium Format
So, practically speaking, I could use the complete C-41 RA chemistry in my Jobo rotary system, right? Looking at some local distributors’ stock, it seems I can actually get the full Fujihunt EnviroNeg set — developer, starter (if needed), bleach, fixer, and stabilizer. Does that sound correct? Thanks!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom