Why then does this stated increase in use of film does not show up at one of the worlds largest labs (150million prints a month), which has a very averaging effect due to their spread over several countries, and which sees an ongoing decline instead ?
That must be a small-town mini-lab. In the Big Smoke here in Australia, something like 6,000 rolls a week (35mm, 120 but virtually no LF processing) are going through DnD or roller processors from just 3 labs working 6 days each week.
I was in a room about a month ago with people from about 20 other mini labs with a couple of representatives from Kodak Alaris and Fujifilm. All the labs were seeing an increase in film developing and sales. The guy from Kodak estimated demand for their film had increased around 15% in 2017 and another 20% this year. It was a very interesting discussion. One of the problems is that most of the processing equipment was manufactured in the 90's to early 00's and it's hard to keep the old beasts running. Noritsu had apparently run some numbers exploring the possibility of restarting production of their C41 processors, but determined they would need to sell far more than the market could sustain. It seems like the executives in Japan are having a hard time believing this is anything more than a passing fad, but the guy from Fujifilm was very interested in what we had to say.
Central Camera. In business since 1899.Every lab I used back in the day in Chicago has closed down. If I lived there now, I would not have any idea where to take my film.
Central Camera. In business since 1899.
One of the things this thread highlights is how different the situation is in various parts of the world. Another thing this thread highlights is how various parts of the world have reacted differently to the changes in the world.
I think the most film users are from Japan and then Europe and the US that is people who have money.When film started to take a dive some people thought that China, South America, India and other 2nd and 3rd world countries would continue to use film. What happened was that in these countries in many ways were first adapters of new digital imaging, they skipped the last generation of analog. I saw a documentary about a guy who set up a photography shop in Bolivia, all he needed was as mid level camera, a couple of lens, a smart phone and an inkjet printer. I imagine that he had to pay a lot for what he did need, don't know what ink and paper cost him, but no film to import, no chemistry, no photo paper, no minilab, does not need to pay a color lat. Must have been a lot cheaper than setting up an analog shop.
I think the most film users are from Japan and then Europe and the US that is people who have money.
When film started to take a dive some people thought that China, South America, India and other 2nd and 3rd world countries would continue to use film. What happened was that in these countries in many ways were first adapters of new digital imaging, they skipped the last generation of analog. I saw a documentary about a guy who set up a photography shop in Bolivia, all he needed was as mid level camera, a couple of lens, a smart phone and an inkjet printer. I imagine that he had to pay a lot for what he did need, don't know what ink and paper cost him, but no film to import, no chemistry, no photo paper, no minilab, does not need to pay a color lat. Must have been a lot cheaper than setting up an analog shop.
A similar thing happened with phone. 3rd World countries skipped telephone poles and line and went straight to cell phone. Too bad, as telephone lines teach valuable lessons and the quality of the signal is superior. Those who abandoned phone line are communcating at an inferior level. (sound familiar?)When film started to take a dive some people thought that China, South America, India and other 2nd and 3rd world countries would continue to use film. What happened was that in these countries in many ways were first adapters of new digital imaging, they skipped the last generation of analog.
Thank you.Here are some figures from one of the biggest labs in Moscow.
Thank you.
But for each figure someone presents, someone else can give a contrary figure. That is the dilemma of these discussions on film sales and processing.
I wonder if someone could run a successful part time business doing film processing in a Phototherm. I'm not talking about making a lot of money, but enough to stay in business for a retired person, maybe a few thousand $ per year.
Yes indeed. Thanks for your calculations.150 rolls per day is a nice run.
I have a mini lab in a small town in the sticks, in a small country on the periphery of Europe. We have had the best six months film processing in the last 5 years.
We have on average a 50% increase in film processing in that time frame...........
Without industry figures to compare, this is all just a nice story. As labs close it will create a bigger pool for those left (hopefully) or this could be the death throes of commercial film developing.
What ever it is, I'm lovin it.
I'm intrigued by this place as its on a route I use from time to time.9. Another examples from the US: New lab (including E6) and film+camera shop in Seattle: https://www.shotonfilmstore.com/
https://www.instagram.com/shotonfilmstore/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?