Michael Kenna Japan

[Pieter12]

If you happen to be on the west side of Los Angeles, Peter Fetterman Gallery has a wonderful show of Michael Kenna's work in Japan. It might even be all the photos in the book. https://www.peterfetterman.com/exhibitions/38-michael-kenna-japan-a-love-story/works/

 

[Alex Benjamin]

If you happen to be on the west side of Los Angeles, Peter Fetterman Gallery has a wonderful show of Michael Kenna's work in Japan. It might even be all the photos in the book. https://www.peterfetterman.com/exhibitions/38-michael-kenna-japan-a-love-story/works/

I would have loved to see this. I'm really surprised at how small the images are — most of them just 8" x 8" —, but I guess that fits with the "haiku" quality he seems to be aiming for.

 

[logan2z]

I would have loved to see this. I'm really surprised at how small the images are — most of them just 8" x 8" —, but I guess that fits with the "haiku" quality he seems to be aiming for.

I saw his recent exhibition at the Center for Photographic Art in Carmel, CA. The prints there were similarly small for the most part, but there were a handful of larger ones. I generally prefer small prints so the size worked for me.

 

[infrar3d]

I saw several of his prints at A Gallery for Fine Photography in New Orleans a few years ago. They were also around that size.

 

[Pieter12]

He prints everything himself. The 8x8 prints are editions of 45, the few 14x14 (I'm guessing here--the gallery listed them art 16x20, but they were square) are editions of 4. I don't know if all the prints of an edition are made at the same time or in batches.

 

[Steven Lee]

In his interviews he often mentions that he prefers smaller prints because the smaller size allows for (apologies, quoting from memory) "more intimate viewing experience".

 

[logan2z]

In his interviews he often mentions that he prefers smaller prints because the smaller size allows for (apologies, quoting from memory) "more intimate viewing experience".

That's exactly why I like smaller prints. I've never understood this trend towards large prints and hold out hope that it reverses at some point.

 

[Richard Jepsen]

Last week I saw one of Kenna’s prints at Photo Eye Bookstore in Santa Fe. Size 8x8. Very rich tones.

I print small for two reasons. I find one can effectively display a 6x9 inch print on a wall and/or on a desktop. The size draws you in. Since I have been printing for 25 years I have enough bigger prints.

 

[MTGseattle]

What's all of this small print nonsense? Doesn't everyone love using gallons of chemistry and moving everything they own to set out drying screens?

As to Michael Kenna, I saw a Japan exhibition in La Jolla, CA in 2004 and I saw a 50-year exhibition here in Seattle last summer. I enjoyed seeing a couple of larger prints by him but agree that there's nothing lacking in his more common 8x8 prints.

 

[logan2z]

What's all of this small print nonsense? Doesn't everyone love using gallons of chemistry and moving everything they own to set out drying screens?

Not to mention all of the additional spotting. I'm printing a bunch of 11x14s for (hopefully) an upcoming exhibition and I've never had to do so much spotting in my life. In comparison, spots on those little 8x10s are a lot harder to see

 

[MTGseattle]

Vey valid point.

 

[Arthurwg]

I used to love MK. Not sure what happened...

 

[Alex Benjamin]

I used to love MK. Not sure what happened...

Curious: what did you used to like, and do not like anymore?

 

[Arthurwg]

Well, I loved "Rouge" way back when, but over the years MK's pictures became ever more perfected and sweet. Nothing wrong with that if that's your taste. These days I much prefer Mark Ruwedel.

 

[Alex Benjamin]

Well, I loved "Rouge" way back when, but over the years MK's pictures became ever more perfected and sweet. Nothing wrong with that if that's your taste. These days I much prefer Mark Ruwedel.

Interesting. I only recently came aware of Rewedel's work. His Message from the Exterior is on my wish-list.

 

[MTGseattle]

Mark Ruwedel is an interesting case. Aside from having multiple projects centered on the names of places, the "Palms/Capri" work is profoundly un-interesting to me. I'm not sure I would compare his work with Michael Kenna. One could argue a certain level of minimalism in Ruwedel's work, but the similarities end there for me.

 

[Alex Benjamin]

Mark Ruwedel is an interesting case. Aside from having multiple projects centered on the names of places, the "Palms/Capri" work is profoundly un-interesting to me. I'm not sure I would compare his work with Michael Kenna. One could argue a certain level of minimalism in Ruwedel's work, but the similarities end there for me.

I don't think Arthurwg was comparing. He rather seemed to be stating that one speaks to him more than the other.

Both can't be compared, although it is interesting to put them side by side. You then realize that they are looking for different things, and looking at the same things differently.

Trees, for example:

Kenna:

Ruwedel:

 

[MTGseattle]

Good assessment. I was likely taking that reply way too literally.

 

[jerrybro]

Oh This one is very interesting