MGIV designed for T-gain films, rumor?

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 4
  • 0
  • 57
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 8
  • 1
  • 60
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 2
  • 2
  • 51
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 4
  • 1
  • 56

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,940
Messages
2,783,564
Members
99,754
Latest member
AndyAnglesey
Recent bookmarks
2

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Wow, I learned something in this thread. Thanks so much guys! It's interesting that some people get so stuck on film curves, with straight line curves and shoulders, etc. It seems that with any film properly exposed and developed you would put the SBR on the straight line of the curve, that film type wouldn't matter, except for maybe some mirco-contrast along the curve.

As far as generic exposure goes for negative films, it really is almost that automatic, but we haven't dealt with all the variables yet. :whistling:

Different films do have different qualities/looks/micro contrast rates/grain structures.

For example extra exposure (beyond what's needed to get on the straight line) with traditional B&W films will normally increase grain in the highlights. With that same extra exposure on C-41 film grain is actually reduced in the shadows instead.

Also part of the obsession with curves and +/- development is "easier printing", less work at the enlarger. Those placement choices though, are totally subjective. To be useful you have to know what you want/what to expect before you snap the shutter.

On an overcast day N+ is can be nice, same idea for night/indoor scenes at N+2. This is because there's not enough contrast in the scene to fill the curves.

In full sun N or N- might be a better choice to "translate" the scene to the paper.

And the toe comes into play with a film much faster without proper exposure then the shoulder does with extreme over-exposure or over development. Am I correct?

Yes, significant underexposure is a true sin and you will be punished for that sin. (Unless of course, it was done on purpose, for effect.)
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
I missed the overdevelopment part of your "is that correct" statement.

If enlarger exposure is "fixed" to say, place skin tones at a specific brightness in a portrait, then excessive/extra development (contraction) of the film will push both highlight and shadow detail off a paper's curve when compared to a normally developed negative. You may also get more grain.

You could adjust the "height of Ralph's box" by changing to softer paper grade (box gets taller) and get that detail back, but you would be "stuck" with the extra grain.

The question becomes subjective, do you want more grain?
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Sure... I use a meter and do write down my times/temp etc for most rolls.
I like Jazz and I do photography that way too....
I used to wrtie down how I made prints but never found that stuff useful years later... Fred Picker ruined photography for me so I went back to my free form ways....

That's cool.

Showing personality in our photos is important.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom