MF lens adapters to 35mm.

The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 3
  • 1
  • 32
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 23
Centre Lawn

A
Centre Lawn

  • 2
  • 2
  • 35

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,906
Messages
2,782,878
Members
99,744
Latest member
NMSS_2
Recent bookmarks
0

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
Has anyone used a mf lens adapter on a 35mm camera? I'm especially interested in Hasselblad to whatever, but would like to hear what else is available.
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
Pentax made adapters to fit the K mount.

Various P6 adaptors for Kiev lenses to most/all of the 35mm mounts.
 

Mongo

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
960
Location
Pittsburgh,
Format
Multi Format
Zoerk makes adapters for some lenses to 35mm bodies. (www.zoerk.com will get you there.) You can often find adapters for various lenses to other body types on eBay. (I know I've seen a Hasselblad - to - Nikon adapter in the past.)

One nice thing that Zoerk makes (that's out of my price range for such things) is an adapter with a shifting lens mount. You use the fact that the image circle on the MF lense is so much larger than needed on the 35mm film to allow you to shift the lens...I'm sure this is much cheaper than purchasing a shift lens for your camera if you already own the MF glass.

Best of luck...I'm sure you'll find something out there.
Dave
 
OP
OP

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
Well adapters abound on Ebay with Canon EF probably having having the most available. You can use anything on it from Hasselblad to M42, and Contax, Olympus, and Leica from what I have seen so far. Sometimes it's nice to put lenses to use that you may not have the right body for.
 

rbarker

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
2,218
Location
Rio Rancho,
Format
Multi Format
To be honest, Wayne, I've been tempted by the Hassy-to-Nikon adapters. But, when I think about it, I already have Nikon lenses that perform similar functions as my Hassy lenses, and there's no way to really couple any of the needed body-to-lens functions. (Imagine having to remove the Hassy lens and manually cock the shutter.) So, I move on to other equipment lusts.

I did find, however, that a Leica M 90mm Elmarit makes an excellent macro lens when affixed to a Nikon body with gaffer's tape. :wink:
 
OP
OP

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
I'm looking at the Hassy to Nikon adapter as well. Why tho would you have to cock the shutter? Wouldn't you just stop the lens down at the dof aperture you want, take a meter reading and set the camera shutter speed?
 

fingel

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2003
Messages
298
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
I have the Hasselblad to Contax adaptor that Hasselblad made. Since I already had a Hasselblad system and a Contax 35mm SLR system, so it just made sence for me. I didn't have any longer Contax lenses and I did for the Hassy.

You don't need to cock the shutter every time you shoot it. You can't get the Hassy lens off the camera unless it is cocked and then when you put it on the adaptor there is no way for the camera to trip the shutter in the lens so it just remains open the whole time like any other lens used with a focal plane shutter camera. Just no automatic diaphragm control. The only thing about using the Hasselblad lenses on a 35mm SLR is that there is usually a smaller, lighter and faster option available for your camera.
My 85mm sonnar for the Contax is about the same size as my 50mm 1.4, but if I put my 80mm planar for the Hassy on the camera, it dwarfs the camera in size and mass, not to mention makes the camera very front heavy.
 
OP
OP

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
fingel said:
I have the Hasselblad to Contax adaptor that Hasselblad made. Since I already had a Hasselblad system and a Contax 35mm SLR system, so it just made sence for me. I didn't have any longer Contax lenses and I did for the Hassy.

You don't need to cock the shutter every time you shoot it. You can't get the Hassy lens off the camera unless it is cocked and then when you put it on the adaptor there is no way for the camera to trip the shutter in the lens so it just remains open the whole time like any other lens used with a focal plane shutter camera. Just no automatic diaphragm control. The only thing about using the Hasselblad lenses on a 35mm SLR is that there is usually a smaller, lighter and faster option available for your camera.
My 85mm sonnar for the Contax is about the same size as my 50mm 1.4, but if I put my 80mm planar for the Hassy on the camera, it dwarfs the camera in size and mass, not to mention makes the camera very front heavy.

There is an adapter available that has a tripod socket on the bottom. It's more money but may make some sense. My intended agenda is to mount my used purchase 60mm CF which cost me $300 more last year then what I can get for it nowdays, if it even sells. Their not in high demand. May as well keep it.
 

rbarker

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
2,218
Location
Rio Rancho,
Format
Multi Format
waynecrider said:
I'm looking at the Hassy to Nikon adapter as well. Why tho would you have to cock the shutter? Wouldn't you just stop the lens down at the dof aperture you want, take a meter reading and set the camera shutter speed?
It was a joke about liking to do things the hard way.
 

df cardwell

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
Dearborn,Mic
Format
Multi Format
I test drove the Hassie to Leica / Nikon adptrs back in the late '80s.

Great lenses, but no better than the 35mm lenses, and certainly more bother.

Shooting wide open is a reasonable option, but give me a 105 Nikkor over the 110 Hassie, and the 85 / Nikon-Canon-Minolta any time.
 
OP
OP

waynecrider

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2003
Messages
2,576
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
df cardwell said:
I test drove the Hassie to Leica / Nikon adptrs back in the late '80s.

Great lenses, but no better than the 35mm lenses, and certainly more bother.

For the $29 to $98 they cost, it's an effective way not to have to spend more money on lenses. Besides, is it more obnoxious then shooting a Lf camera?

The thing is, your just not going to get value out of anything you sell, (if you can do it), that's film related nowdays. Hassy lenses included.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom