It occurs to me that I (and possibly others) struggle with being a "hobbyist." Time that I can devote to photography gets shoehorned into my day or weekend when I can make it work. This leads to a worry that I am on a limited schedule and must make the pictures "count." Expanding upon that, sometimes I worry that I am photographing subjects that have been photographed before ad nauseum. I need to let this line of thinking die. The recent thread regarding Andre Kertesz is a fine example of one of many photographers who have made very interesting images out of very common dare I say mundane subjects. It can be done, and any time spent photographing should in theory help one's craft.
@Bill Burk That is an interesting conundrum you posted regarding your friend's sculpture. I wonder if Julius Schulman ever had to photograph a building he really didn't like? Didn't like isn't exact enough, a building he had no affinity for is more apt.
