Medium format cameras for beginners...

Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 1
  • 2
  • 48
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 5
  • 2
  • 93
Tree and reflection

H
Tree and reflection

  • 2
  • 0
  • 74
CK341

A
CK341

  • 5
  • 1
  • 83
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

A
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 3
  • 0
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,628
Messages
2,762,138
Members
99,425
Latest member
dcy
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
13
Location
Central Mich
At the price Mamiya C220's are going for these days, I consider them almost a steal. I've had one now for several years. The 5 element 80mm f-2.8 lens can hold it's own with any of the other TLR's out there. Getting other lens sizes is getting cheaper all the time. These cameras are, indeed, built like tanks and will hold up to almost any abuse. Also, the viewing screen is very nice, and can be upgraded to a Beattie or Maxwell if one feels the need.

Dave
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
898
Location
Bryan Texas
Format
Large Format
My first was a C330 loved it nice and easy 120 and 220 is not to expensive and lenses are easy to buy
If you are interested I have an RB that I am trying to sale it has a 220 back
if you want more info send a PM not trying to be pushy just mentioning :smile:
 

sanking

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Messages
5,437
Location
Greenville,
Format
Large Format
Has anyone mentioned the Fuji GW and GSW II and II cameras, available in 6X7 and 6X9 format? These cameras would make great first cameras for someone interested in medium format because they are totally manual and very compact, when considering the size of the negative. And they make great travel cameras also, again taking into consideration the large size of the negative.

Sandy
 

Konical

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
1,824
Good Afternoon,

I'll second the comment above about the Fuji MF rangefinders, at least the 6 x 7. the lens is terrific, the overall quality seems to be excellent; the only drawback is that they're still a bit pricey used, although much more reasonable than when they were being sold new.

Konical
 

Buster6X6

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
715
Location
London Ontar
Format
Multi Format
Hi Andre
I started three and a half years ago with Yashicamat 124. And I enjoyed it a lot.You can find a lot of information on the Net about the camera.If you are interested I am willing to part with mine for $100.Send me PM if you decide

Good luck

Greg
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
For the money this deal can't be passed up...

RB67s are going cheap these days. These cameras are built like Russian tanks. The most you'll have to do on a 30 yr old RB are the seals, and that can be done by anyone with a razor and some self stick foam. I saw one on PhotoNet for $350, a deal that couln't be beat, I'll tell you, it's a 100 times better than any 40yr fungus eatten TLR you can get for that money.
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
13
Location
Central Mich
paul ron said:
RB67s are going cheap these days. These cameras are built like Russian tanks. The most you'll have to do on a 30 yr old RB are the seals, and that can be done by anyone with a razor and some self stick foam. I saw one on PhotoNet for $350, a deal that couln't be beat, I'll tell you, it's a 100 times better than any 40yr fungus eatten TLR you can get for that money.
Your points well taken, but RB's aren't for everyone. They are very big and very heavy, not something smaller or older people want to take on casual strolls or plan on hand holding a lot. I seen a C220 TLR go on epay for under $100 with it being stated the lens had no fungus (my own C220 has no fungus on either the chrome 80mm or chrome 180mm). The C220 is light enough to be easily hand held and carried for long stetches. All just depends on what ones needs are.

Dave
 

rexp

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
168
Location
Lincoln, Neb
Format
Med. Format RF
Well nobody has mentioned a Rapid Omega, so I will. I have been having a blast with mine. They were origionally designed for military use, and are quite reliable. Many a wedding has been shot (imaged may be a better choice here) with a RO. They go pretty cheap on ee-bray. I picked another one up yesterday for under $100, time will tell how good of shape it is in. I am fortunate that the best Koni repairman around lives about an hour away. Greg Webber has all the spare parts and knowledge of how to use them, along with factory manuals & tooling. Not only is he a great repairman, but a swell guy to boot. It was interesting to visit "Koni Heaven" and have a guided tour of his repair shop. Always nice to know these fine cameras can be maintained.

A good site to read up on the Rapid Omegas is at:
Dead Link Removed

Some folks rant & rave about the Koni lenses being equal to the Hasse.. (ok - I won't go there) ... being such sharp lenses. I am very happy with the results I get, and considering the dufus holding the camera that is saying a lot. I don't know anyone around here to do some realistic comparisions with, so's I just keep shooting away. Happy and oblivious.
 
Joined
Jan 10, 2005
Messages
13
Location
Central Mich
A friend of mine had a Rapid Omega many years ago, and I can vouch for the fact that it had very sharp optics. It falls into the same catagory as the Mamiya Super 23 and Universal, which are also equiped with excellent optics. These and the Graphic press cameras use big (6x7 or 6x9) negs and can make great cameras. They are a bit more awkward then a TLR or SLR, but prices are going down and they could make a good beginners camera that has great quality potential. I still occasionally use my Super 23 and Century Graphic. I still prefer a TLR or Folder to just carry around for general use, though, as they are more convenient.

Dave
 

Konical

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
1,824
Good Afternoon,

Another vote for the Koni-Omega. The design is ingenious; the lenses are great; the ergonomics are admirable. The only real drawbacks are weight and the tendency of the backs to have spacing problems.

Konical
 

papagene

Membership Council
Council
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
5,435
Location
Tucson, AZ
Format
Multi Format
sanking said:
Has anyone mentioned the Fuji GW and GSW II and II cameras, available in 6X7 and 6X9 format?
Sandy

I also agree with Sandy on this. The Fuji's are wonderful cameras, easy to use with great lenses. I have the GW670II and the GSW690III. But I also feel that they are great cameras for the experienced photographer as well.

gene
 

digiconvert

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
817
Location
Cannock UK
Format
Multi Format
Cheap and cheerful

André Ferreira said:
I was wondering what kind of camera would be good for someone to begin with the medium format...
André Ferreira.
I have a Lubitel 166B, excellent condition with case etc., cost £11 (approx $18) on eBay incl postage. It is NOT the easiest camera in the world to use and you will need a lightmeter of some sort (a 35mm camera will do) but it is cheap enough to try out and check what 6x6 format can give, the negatives will astonish you after 35mm. I love this camera it's such great FUN and am looking to get a Seagull (new) or Flexaret to go with it, the TLR bug may very well strike you down :smile:.Here are a couple of examples as to what you can get from this camera.
Cheers CJB

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

Troy Ammons

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
172
Format
Multi Format
As you can see from above, the choices are endless. Skipp the Holga its junk. Also dont forget you will probably need a MF film scanner of some sort.

At first i think it depends on how you like to shoot, and that depends on tripod, handheld, etc etc. Portraits or stilllifes. Landscape or snapshots and although you might know the subject you like to shoot you dont know which MF camera is best for you to take those shots yet.

The format question should come first. Do you want 645, 6x6, 6x7 or 6x9.

Probably the next step is to decide what type of camera fits me and what do i shoot. Rangefinder, TLR, SLR, older RF (very manual) and go from there.

On the SLR side, ask, do I want a TLR or a SLR type camera ?? and decide if you want to frame through a prism like with a Pentax 645n, or pentax 67 (like a giant 35mm camera) or if you prefer a chimney finder, like a hassy style where you look through the top. One thing to remember is a non prism chimney finder camera like a hassy, the image is flipped from side to side. Drives some people nuts.

Once you figure all that out, you will be close.

The main types are......

Rangefinders - good for landscapes and low light shooting, but framing and close up shooting is not that great. Great for backpacking. Not so great for portraits, product, still lifes etc.

Most of these modern cameras are light. The fuji GA series has AF and AE and autowind. The GA645ZI is like a giant P+S MF camera with a 3 step zoom lens. There are also the Mamiya 7, Mamiya 6, all the fuji 690's too. Also there are all the older cameras like the Mamiya press, 2x3 crown graphic etc etc. The Fujis have fixed lenses except for some of the early RF cameras. Too many to list really.

The top of the line of these is probably the latest interchangeable lens Mamiya 6/7. Probably the best deal for the $ is the Fuji GA645 cameras, or the early Fuji 690 cameras, but the early 690's are very heavy. Maybe the Bronica too.

TLR cameras - Probably the best all around for low light and accurate framing, due to the dual lenses. No mirror slap, etc. but they can be heavy. Also these are chimney viewfinder cameras and usually have fixed lenses.

All of these are totally manual cameras as far as I know. The top of the line for these is the Rollei's. Probably the most versatile are the interchangeable lens Mamiya C220 and C330 cameras.

Great low light anything camera where you need accurate framing.

SLR cameras - Of these there are several styles.

The first type is like the Pentax 645n, or pentax 67. Those are like giant 35mm cameras with a prism. The 645N is auto everything, if you buy AF lenses. The 67II has auto aperture exposure only. There are a few of these type cameras around, mostly in 645. mamiya 645, Contax Bronica and maybe a couple of others.

Of these probably the top would be the Pentax 67II, Pentax 645nII, Contax There are quite a few top cameras in this area.

Probably the best deal is an older Pentax 645 or older mamiya 645.

The second type of SLR is the chimney finder type like , Hassy, Kowa, Mamiya RB/RZ, etc. some of these you can buy angled prism finders for so you can shoot them normally from the back. You can get a chimney finder for a Pentax 67, but no rotating back.

Within this chimney SLR group there are 2 types again. Some of these cameras like the Hassy 501 have internal focus lenses. Some have non focusing lenses and bellows focus like the RB/RZ and Fuji 680. Something like a Pentax 645 type slr is easier to shoot handheld. The bellows cameras are better on a tripod and much better for macro photography.

The best of these are the Rollei 6008, Fuji 680, Hassy, RZ.

The best deal in this area is probably a Kowa 66/super 66/66m, a Mamiya RB (bellows)or a Bronica. Also to me something like a Kowa 66 is easier to shoot then a Mamiya RB.

If you managed to wade through this long winded post you can see there are an awful lot of choices out there. Actually too many to start, and the only way to know what will fit you is to start renting and shooting cameras.

Also you may want to go here and read a lot and especially read the Danny Gonzales overview. It has a lot of good info.

Dead Link Removed

I think the first step is choosing a film size depending on your enlargement requirements. The next logical step is to choose a RF, TLR or SLR.
 

battra92

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2005
Messages
217
Format
Medium Format
A really cheap way to get into MF while still having focusing, and manual settings would be to get an Argoflex. Unfortunately you'd either have to respool 120 to 620 spools or find the earlier model which took both. Takes great 6 x6 pictures and costs about the same as a Holga. Sure it's not a Rolleiflex but for under $20, it's a pretty fun classic.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom