The first two do not need batteries. I would also add all Mamiya TLRs to your list: C220, C330 and their predecessors. IMO those represent the best overall value in medium format right now.
The Pentax 67 models all require a battery to fire the shutter.
The Plaubel Makina 67 does not need batteries to function. Only the meter.
The first two do not need batteries. I would also add all Mamiya TLRs to your list: C220, C330 and their predecessors. IMO those represent the best overall value in medium format right now.
Welcome to Photrio.Could you please tell me if either of the two i.e. the Mamiya RB67 & the Hasselblad 500 CM have a superior output than the other in terms of clarity of the photographs?
Thanks so much!
Welcome to Photrio.
Both are capable of extraordinarily high quality results. They were top line professional cameras in their day. They continue to be used in that capacity by a small percentage of professionals.
Condition is critical. The choice between them might be mandated by whether you can access local repair people.
In both cases, their lenses are excellent and the choice is extensive. Local availability may again mandate your choice.
Yes.Can the Mamiya RB67 switch backs half-way through a roll like the Hasselblad 500 CM can?
The Koni-Omega series of 6x7 cameras do not need batteries. Many (most? all?) TLRs (6x6) won't need batteries either for the shutter, though some have internal meters that will need batteries. There are also a ton of medium format folding cameras (6x4.5, 6.6, 6x9) that are fully mechanical.
Vikram, film cameras do not have any effect on the quality of the photographs. They are just black boxes that hold film in complete darkness behind the lens. The quality of photographs depends on the lens and the film type. Both RB67 and Hasselblad are interchangeable lens cameras, and both systems have plenty of quality lenses to choose from.
Vikram, film cameras do not have any effect on the quality of the photographs. They are just black boxes that hold film in complete darkness behind the lens. The quality of photographs depends on the lens and the film type. Both RB67 and Hasselblad are interchangeable lens cameras, and both systems have plenty of quality lenses to choose from.
They differ by the negative size: the Mamiya produces a slightly bigger 6x7 negative vs Hasselblad's 6x6. In return, the Hasselblad is lighter and less bulky.
I would like to purchase a completely Analog Medium Format Camera i.e. which can function fully without requiring batteries
( i don't need flash ).
Could someone here be kind enough to guide me on the best medium format analog cameras without the consideration of price.
I really like TLR cameras, most of them require no batteries and if they require batteries they will operate without them and the lightmeter (Battery is used for the lightmeter) on those TLR's are considered very bad/inaccurate (mostly left unused) .
The main difference you should first consider is that their formats are different. The RB67 is 6x7cm while the Hasselblad is a 6:6cm square format. First decide on the format you want.Could you please tell me if either of the two i.e. the Mamiya RB67 & the Hasselblad 500 CM have a superior output than the other in terms of clarity of the photographs?
Thanks so much!
If you use a RB67 Pro-S or RB67 Pro-SD with film backs of similar vintage, you also can't forget to wind the film.If you are asking for an opinion, I would choose a Hasselblad over an RB 67, because it is smaller, lighter to carry around, and easier to use (you can't forget to wind the film on a Hasselblad to the next frame by accident).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?