you were able to measure beyond 1/200? I'm impressed!
you were able to measure beyond 1/200? I'm impressed!
Why this?
Your phone must have a very quick response, I use it in an old iPhone4 and anything faster than 200 gets lost in noise
What would be the ideal light source for such measurements?
By the way, my iPhone is no longer the newest, but I'll use it until it's no longer supported. The battery capacity is still at 95% despite daily intensive use.
A constant light source (no flickering)
I have used photoplug for leaf shutters and going faster than 200 is a challengeThis depends on the light source as well. If you look at the plots in Andreas' example, you can see some wiggly noise which is likely the switching frequency of the LED driver. There are plenty of light sources (including LED) that will flicker at twice grid frequency (so 100Hz / 120Hz) and those may give problems especially with faster shutter speeds.
Which type/frequency?
In Austria we have a mains frequency of 50 Hertz (230 Veff AC).
There are almost no light bulbs anymore available, LEDs with the corresponding electronics to switch remain.
I got this from Home Depot but I guess you could find something similar in Austria.
I was surprised that the color temp is constant at 5200K even when I dimmed it and yet it doesn't flicker. I use the Minolta booster sensor connected to an oscilloscope to check.EcoSmart 100-Watt Equivalent R20 CEC Dimmable LED Flood Light Bulb in Daylight 5000K (1-Bulb) A20R2050WT2001 - The Home Depot
Enhance your home with the EcoSmart R20 reflector LED light bulb. This 100-Watt equivalent LED light bulb uses on 12.5-Watt of energy to produce 1470 Lumens of Daylight (5000K) color temperature. Perfectwww.homedepot.com
@titrisol that's pretty pronounced 'ringing' as it's often called in electronics. I'm not familiar with the innards of the Photoplug, but the first thing that comes to mind is that it matters a lot what the input impedance of the phone/tablet is. This is of little help to you, I imagine, but from a practical perspective, you could try plugging it into a different type of device and see if you get the same kind of results. My expectation is that a lower input impedance device will give better performance. This means that the device may work better on a line input than a mic input.
To lower the impedance, it might also help to clean the connector on the iPhone and the plug.
No, this doesn't change the input impedance of the device. Contact resistance is a different thing from input impedance. There's no sign of a poor contact in the scope plots of @titrisol.
To clarify, it evidently doesn't hurt to clean the connector. But it's not going to solve this particular problem.
@titrisol that's pretty pronounced 'ringing' as it's often called in electronics. I'm not familiar with the innards of the Photoplug, but the first thing that comes to mind is that it matters a lot what the input impedance of the phone/tablet is. This is of little help to you, I imagine, but from a practical perspective, you could try plugging it into a different type of device and see if you get the same kind of results. My expectation is that a lower input impedance device will give better performance. This means that the device may work better on a line input than a mic input.
I haven't looked into this in detail, but isn't ohmic (transition) resistance a variable in alternating current resistance (impedance)?
The signal runs via plug and socket?
I found the photoplug too kludgey ... it took it and rigged it up with a really cheap digital storage oscilloscope ... so better.
I got a Time machine
Recently I have restarted a search of a device to test shutter speeds … always good to know if you have done it right. There are a number of devices out there that can do this: KyoritsuZTSpho…oldcam.wordpress.com
It is not too hard to make a focal plane shutter of known velocity and slit width with which to test or calibrate a shutter tester.
This calibrated, rotating, focal plane shutter produces waveforms for 1/250, 1/500 and 1/1000 of a second. These 'standard' waveforms can be compared to the waveforms of test cameras with focal plane shutters.
View attachment 360923
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?