justin parker
Member
I have been pondering what is the simplest method to measure small volumes of the Kodak Flexicolor LU LORR C-41 developer components to do one-shot processing in my rotary processor. (For those times when I don't have enough rolls made up to justify mixing up the whole 5L+ batch.)
If I want to measure out 2L of developer tank solution I come up with numbers like this:
[TABLE="width: 327"]
Starting Water
[TD="align: right"]1220.80[/TD]
Developer LU LORR Part A
[TD="align: right"]122.08[/TD]
Developer LU LORR Part B
[TD="align: right"]34.18[/TD]
Developer LU LORR Part C
[TD="align: right"]17.09[/TD]
Add Water to Make:
[TD="align: right"]1940.00[/TD]
(Should be
)
[TD="align: right"]545.85[/TD]
Add Starter:
[TD="align: right"]60.00[/TD]
Total tank solution:
[TD="align: right"]2000.00[/TD]
[/TABLE]
To measure 122.08, 34.18, 17.09 mL seems tricky to do even with a pipettte. Would it not be easier to use a digital scale, say one that was accurate to .01g precision with a 500g capacity? Those sell for cheap. To be really precise I would need to know the specific gravity of each part, which I am not sure Kodak publishes. But I could maybe assume 1.034 which is what they have as a published number for the overall developer.
I am curious if this is a good idea or not?
Cheers,
Justin
If I want to measure out 2L of developer tank solution I come up with numbers like this:
[TABLE="width: 327"]
[TD="align: right"]1220.80[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]122.08[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]34.18[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]17.09[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]1940.00[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]545.85[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]60.00[/TD]
[TD="align: right"]2000.00[/TD]
[/TABLE]
To measure 122.08, 34.18, 17.09 mL seems tricky to do even with a pipettte. Would it not be easier to use a digital scale, say one that was accurate to .01g precision with a 500g capacity? Those sell for cheap. To be really precise I would need to know the specific gravity of each part, which I am not sure Kodak publishes. But I could maybe assume 1.034 which is what they have as a published number for the overall developer.
I am curious if this is a good idea or not?
Cheers,
Justin