MC enlarging lenses?

Sonatas XII-50 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-50 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 2K
Tower and Moon

A
Tower and Moon

  • 3
  • 0
  • 2K
Light at Paul's House

A
Light at Paul's House

  • 3
  • 2
  • 3K
Slowly Shifting

Slowly Shifting

  • 0
  • 0
  • 2K
Waiting

Waiting

  • 1
  • 0
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,738
Messages
2,795,884
Members
100,019
Latest member
FlatsLander
Recent bookmarks
0

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Doesn't that thread give the answer you seek?
 
OP
OP

chip j

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2012
Messages
2,193
Location
NE Ohio
Format
35mm
I don't know if the last 50mm 2.8 offerings from Schneider/Rodenstock were MC. The El-Nikkor was.
 

jjphoto

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
402
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
I don't know if the last 50mm 2.8 offerings from Schneider/Rodenstock were MC. The El-Nikkor was.

Does it matter, except on an OCD semi academic level? I don't think I've ever come across an enlarging lens that is not coated at all, even the early Kodak Ektars from the 1940's are coated.

I haven't tried to look up any documentation but am certain that when Rodenstock introduced the APO-RODAGON-N line (IIRC in the mid 1990's) one of the differences was that the lenses were multicoated whilst in the previous APO-RODAGON line the lenses were not (ie. they were single coated). I don't know if multi coating was later applied to all Rodenstock ELs.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom