+1 on this.
ZS is about being aware of the light falling the scene and how you can somehow control the relationship of these tones in a print (within limits), by a careful choice of exposure, development and print controls.
"Shadows on zone III" is just a starting point, often for a literal translation of the tones as the eyes see them.
Tonal values? That's it? That's all visualization encompasses? Then I've been under a misunderstanding. I thought visualization was some sort of Zen feeling one has before pulling the shutter release that encompasses getting to the mystical ambiance and power of the scene and capturing it in photographs.
Maybe twenty years ago when in Aspen never having seen A A's photograph I was at Maroon Bells and hiking up the trail carrying my camera and an aluminum tripod when a lightning storm started up. I stashed my tripod in the bushes thinking I could be holding a lightning rod. I dashed back to the car waiting for it to clear. After the weather cleared I went searching for my tripod and fortunately I found it. On my way back to the car I took this image. I'm sure there are thousands of similar ones of the same view out there.
if, that is, you are saying, that the prints tonal relationships are not the essence of the prints expressive value.
There's nothing shout the ZS that dictates all shadows must be full of detail.
Exactly. The principle is quite simple: you need shadow detail in your negative in order to be able to decide if you want shadow detail in your print.
The corollary as well: you need to carefully place and develop for nuanced highlight details in your negative, in order to decide if want nuanced highlight detail in your print.
With the latter being more frequently encountered in something like a snow scene or high key portrait.
With negatives, of course, there are a few more available tools available to deal with poorly resolved highlights than poorly resolved shadows.
But the over-arching idea is that you should visualize the final result and then, where appropriate, apply Zone System tools to help it come to pass.
The information needs to be on the film. If the details are not on the negatives, there is no way to raise the details from the dead.
Those trees are not black. The details are there. This is from a calendar.I don't know about the actual print, but the shot on the web shows trees completely black. So who needs shadow details? How does the zone system fit into his aesthetic look which frankly I like the way it is.
It's a nice picture but I wonder what we'd have said if a Photrio member, say, someone called BB had placed this in the gallery say yesterday? I somehow doubt it would have generated 2 pages of posts.
pentaxuser
If BB had taken the image in 1950 - 1 year before AA - and posted it to the internet back then () then it probably would have.
I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have a stiff upper lip than a smilie.I take the opportunity to say this as I have just posted a thread on my smilie problem - I have no smilies at all
I don't know about you, but I'd much rather have a stiff upper lip than a smilie.
Yet another reminder that one should step away from the computer monitor or TV screen and look at real prints from time to time.Those trees are not black. The details are there. This is from a calendar.View attachment 326421
One cannot judge on most photographs posted on the internet.
"Though Ansel took plenty of time to discuss art and photography with his fellow creators—including a conversation that would lead to the founding of Aperture magazine"
It annoys the hell out of me that these writers cannot use the word "artist" anymore. They use "creator"? WTF? A draftsman creates a drawing. A brick mason creates a wall. And I could go on. Is there something politically incorrect or "un-woke" about calling an artist an "artist"?
This shit happens at my office too. I am a Technical Writer and not an artist. The assholes in HR insist that I am a "creator". I am NOT.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?