Well, if you don't have an auto exposure camera, or a meter, and you trust your friend, it's either that or Sunny 16.How about this scenario... you're out shooting with a friend, setting up kind of the same shot and you ask "hey Tom, what settings are you using?" And Tom says 1/30 at f/5.6
So you figure you trust your buddy and set your camera at 1/8 and f5.6 because he's shooting Kodachrome 64 and you're shooting Panatomic-X with a yellow filter.
Yeah it's been a few years since I did that but you couldn't ask for a better friend... and Manual mode
How about this scenario... you're out shooting with a friend, setting up kind of the same shot and you ask "hey Tom, what settings are you using?" And Tom says 1/30 at f/5.6
So you figure you trust your buddy and set your camera at 1/8 and f5.6 because he's shooting Kodachrome 64 and you're shooting Panatomic-X with a yellow filter.
Yeah it's been a few years since I did that but you couldn't ask for a better friend... and Manual mode
Your response is unclear to me. Are you saying that shooting manual vs. automatic is not a personal preference? And which way is a more personal experience and why?
What's the attraction?
Set and forget.
E.g. Shooting some family pool photos the other day, using provia. I dial in manually until the aqua blue water meters at +1.5. Then I know it will expose properly, regardless (unless light changes)
In auto mode it will keep changing, and get it wrong half the time.
In that scenario, (as if you could possibly know), Tom had an OM-2 and I had an OM-4...Well, if you don't have an auto exposure camera, or a meter, and you trust your friend, it's either that or Sunny 16.
Modern digital cameras too for that matter
Well said. In high contrast situations I'm typically shooting one-and-two-thirds of a stop underexposed for the look I want. Automation would try to find detail in the shadows and bleach out faces caught in sunlight, making the shot lack any drama. I was a late adopter to digital - it's still a minority interest - but I imagined exposure automation had somehow caught up, silly idea but digital had run 15 years with me still shooting film exclusively. I was disappointed to see how bland my first aperture priority DSLR results were. Went back to manual and the shots were fine. No doubt the latitude of the latest cameras mean people "fix it in post".Set and forget.
E.g. Shooting some family pool photos the other day, using provia. I dial in manually until the aqua blue water meters at +1.5. Then I know it will expose properly, regardless (unless light changes)
In auto mode it will keep changing, and get it wrong half the time.
I only shoot manual mode when I have to.
Which is mainly all of my cameras except for DSLRs and the F3.
My MF gear is all manual.
Let's say your meter reads 125th sec at f5.6. How do you manually set your film camera to one and two-thirds of a stop underexposed?Well said. In high contrast situations I'm typically shooting one-and-two-thirds of a stop underexposed for the look I want. Automation would try to find detail in the shadows and bleach out faces caught in sunlight, making the shot lack any drama.
Even if your camera doesn't support intermediate shutter speeds, or your lens doesn't have clicks between full stops, you can just set the aperture at any point in between. Not perfectly accurate, but does the trick.Let's say your meter reads 125th sec at f5.6. How do you manually set your film camera to one and two-thirds of a stop underexposed?
Correct. AF cameras typically have metering readouts that show in variable increments. Fabberyman doesn't want an answer, he pursues every post I make with a silly comment.Even if your camera doesn't support intermediate shutter speeds, or your lens doesn't have clicks between full stops, you can just set the aperture at any point in between. Not perfectly accurate, but does the trick.
Ok if your camera only has a manual mode, or has no meter, then I guess this question is moot.
Thinking of those cameras with both a manual mode and aperture or shutter priority, so that's most SLRs. (Modern digital cameras too for that matter.) When do you find you use the Manual mode? I.e. where you set both the shutter speed and aperture, as opposed to letting the camera choose one or the other? On my cameras, it's next to never really, obviously except the OM-1ɴ.
I tend to use the built in meters, so if I pick eg F/8 and in Auto the camera says 1/125th, I don't feel I'm really adding much to the process by being in Manual mode instead and dialling-in 1/125th on the shutter speed dial.
If I want a particularly slow shutter speed, eg 1/8th, I'll use Auto mode and close the aperture until I get 1/8th in the viewfinder (say F/16 for sake of argument).
In manual mode, I'd select 1/8th on the shutter speed dial and close the aperture until the meter tells me the exposure is correct, which would be the same F/16.
So same outcome, but an extra step all the time.
What's the attraction? What have I missed all these years? The only thing off the top of my head is it probably makes exposure compensation a tad easier. But I tend to be happy using the dial for that. EDIT: Oh and my OM-2SP only offers spot metering in manual mode, so I have used manual on that a bit, but that's an unusual exception.
And this works too. If you get to the same destination as manual, then that's no big deal.Correct, but I find it easier just to dial-in +1.5 on the compensation dial, which is right or thereabouts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?