Post your results. I'd like to see them. I just bought a pair of RB67's that should be showing up today with aluminum hard case, WLF, Metered Prism Finder, 2x converter, 2 120 backs, 1 220 back, 90mm F3.8 and 180mmF4.5. I can't wait to give them a once over and try them out!
The 140 Macro is supposed to be great and the 150 SF is interesting. One of those two depending on if you want to do portraits of people or June Bugs.
tim in san jose
I am done with wide because i ordered 65mm yesterday, so the only one left is the longer one.
Also i was thinking about tilt shift, but which one is better, getting a tilt/shift lens or a tilt shift adapter?
I am done with wide because i ordered 65mm yesterday, so the only one left is the longer one.
I have 180mm on my RZ, and it is so great for portraits, so i feel either go with Macro as this is the only option i don't have on RB or RZ or even my Hasselblad 501CM, but i don't know if i should get Macro for RB so i can use it on RZ sometimes or better with RZ even i don't like RZ battery issue? RZ is giving me the easiest way to shoot with tripod, clocking the shutter, and dialing with the back and focusing screen, i tested RB few days ago for first time and it wasn't easy as RZ, so i may keep RZ in use with RB if not more.
Also i was thinking about tilt shift, but which one is better, getting a tilt/shift lens or a tilt shift adapter?
Do you have the zoom? And the big Tele? Also if you need macro, why not use extenders?
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk
The 140 macro is optimized for flat field performance at close focus distances. Other lenses (e.g. the 90mm) also work well at close distances, and in fact allow even closer working distance without extenders, but don't offer the same flat field performance.
My "small" kit for the RB67 is the 65mm and the 140mm macro.
Oh no, not disputing the suitability of the lens, I thought the OP wanted to own the range of lenses, hence my response.
Sent from my LT26i using Tapatalk
I just had my first negs from my newest RB67 lens, the 250 C, developed and I think they're gorgeous. Maybe I got lucky with this particular lens but it's great - nicely sharp and contrasty.
I think if you don't recognize the quality of the glass you are using, you should take up macrame instead.
Nice detail.
tim in san jose
Looks good, dude!
Thanks!
What is macrame?
A hobby knotting twine into lamp holders and cheap necklaces.
Ah ok, thank you very much!
Sooner or later i will test 127mm, not sure which film i should use, 100ASA or 400? Kodak or Ilford or Fuji? B&W or color?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?