Mamiya 645 80mm f/4 Macro Lens

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 4
  • 0
  • 44
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 2
  • 47
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 48
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 7
  • 5
  • 197

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,819
Messages
2,781,292
Members
99,714
Latest member
MCleveland
Recent bookmarks
0

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
I have a Mamiya 645 Pro TL, and along with it came the Auto Macro Spacer for a 80mm f/4. This was included when I bought the camera a couple of years ago. I've been using a 120mm f/4 macro all along, and today, I got to wondering if adding the 80mm f/4 would be a good idea. The 80mm, obviously gives 1:2, and 1:1 with it. Other than that flexibility, is there any other reason to own the 80mm f/4 macro?

Any comments, one way or the other?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,927
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I use one as my only 80mm lens - the 55mm tends to be my "standard" focal length, because the field of view suits me more.
It is bigger than the 80mm f/2.8 and uses bigger (67mm) filters.
It has a really long focus throw, so it is good for precise focus, but it would be hard to use for action.
The front element is well shaded by the lens body.
You are really close to your subject when you are working at maximum magnification.
They are relatively inexpensive for such a high quality and versatile lens.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
As I understand the description, the macro extension seems to be about 80mm to get 1:1 with the 80.

With the 120 it should give about .75. So, Do you need/want 1:1 on film?
 

Neil Grant

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
543
Location
area 76
Format
Multi Format
...half life-size or 1:1 magnifications aren't the only reasons for owning a macro 80mm for the Mamiya 645. Neither of the 80mm standard lenses focus particularly close unaided. Adding a tube is fiddly, inconvenient and loses infinity focus. Being able to quickly focus between 0.7m to 0.4m could be very useful depending on your style of photography. Neither distance is really 'macro'. Few of the 645 lenses focus very close - adding tubes is just part of a working method. Bit of a shame because medium format naturally delivers shallow depth of field - and that's just not as easily explored as it could be. Just try comparing how easy medium close up photography is with say an RB 67, C series TLR or Rollei 66. I think I'd get a 80 macro as a walkaround lens.
 
OP
OP
Dennis-B

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
Thanks for your responses. A local dealer has the 80mm f/4 macro for @ $160. Think I'll take a chance and buy it.

PS - I've normally set up the 120mm f/4 on a tripod, mostly for static subjects like flowers, fountain pens, etc.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom