Donald Qualls
Subscriber
Haven't gotten a response from the seller yet, but I made an offer (below BIN) for a Mamiya 16 Automatic "untested" after checking that I can buy new made 3D printed film cartridges (I'm willing to test the cartridges and add light tightness if/as needed).
Why would I buy one of these when I have Minolta 16, 16 II, MG, MGs, QT, Kiev 30, and Kiev 303? It's barely bigger than a Minolta 16, but without the telescoping operation (knob-edge advance), with a wider shutter speed range, tripod and cable release socket, PC connector and accessory shoe, f/2.8 focusing lens and built-in 4x ND filter -- and can operate fully manual if the meter cell is dead. Cassettes are less available, but I've watch-listed a UK source, and three or four will do all I need. And, like the Minolta format cameras, it doesn't care about film perfs, so I can use cine, unperfed, or film slit from 35 mm or 120 (just as with my Minolta cameras).
The only disadvantage is the 10x14 mm frame (same as the early Minolta cameras), but I've gotten many good prints from the MG I bought first in 1981; with care and a decent lens, plus the ability to nail focus instead of depending on hyperfocal or a close-up diopter, I expect to get similar results. And 16 mm cine film in short rolls is cheap compared to bigger negatives...
Why would I buy one of these when I have Minolta 16, 16 II, MG, MGs, QT, Kiev 30, and Kiev 303? It's barely bigger than a Minolta 16, but without the telescoping operation (knob-edge advance), with a wider shutter speed range, tripod and cable release socket, PC connector and accessory shoe, f/2.8 focusing lens and built-in 4x ND filter -- and can operate fully manual if the meter cell is dead. Cassettes are less available, but I've watch-listed a UK source, and three or four will do all I need. And, like the Minolta format cameras, it doesn't care about film perfs, so I can use cine, unperfed, or film slit from 35 mm or 120 (just as with my Minolta cameras).
The only disadvantage is the 10x14 mm frame (same as the early Minolta cameras), but I've gotten many good prints from the MG I bought first in 1981; with care and a decent lens, plus the ability to nail focus instead of depending on hyperfocal or a close-up diopter, I expect to get similar results. And 16 mm cine film in short rolls is cheap compared to bigger negatives...