major Film makers fuji, kodak, Ilford...how many rolls are they making a year?

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 5
  • 3
  • 40
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 1
  • 45
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 5
  • 0
  • 77
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 100
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 70

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,839
Messages
2,781,671
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

cmo

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,321
Format
35mm RF
There is one company not mentioned: Filmotec in Germany, better known for it's old brand name ORWO. These guys produce b/w motion picture films like the ORWO UN 54, a viable 100 ASA film in fact, without rem-jet and at least as good as Kodak's b/w motion picture films. Some people buy big rolls from dealers like Wephota or Wittner Kinotechnik and roll their own 135/36, probably one of the cheapest ways to feed a rangefinder or SLR.

http://www.filmotec.com/English_Site/Products/products.html
 

erikg

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2003
Messages
1,444
Location
pawtucket rh
Format
Multi Format
For the motion picture knowledgeable: why doesn't black and white neg stock (double-x, plus-x) have the rem-jet backing?
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
For the motion picture knowledgeable: why doesn't black and white neg stock (double-x, plus-x) have the rem-jet backing?

Probably because the process for B&W is as old as the hills, when the ECN process came out it was brand new and they could add what is a potentially tricky step. ECN2 followed along.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Part of this is due to the antistatic properties of rem-jet. At high speeds during printing or filming, static electricity can discharge and fog film. Rem-jet is conductive and dissipates any charge. B&W films are now coated on a conductive stock that contains a small amount of conductive material.

In addition, rem-jet is very neutral, a must for color film.

Those are my takes on this.

PE
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
The electrostatic "load" should be the same for colour and b&w films.
And when REM-Jet was introduced there was no other good antistatic agent to be employed, to my knowledge.

So this whole REM-Jet thing is still enigmatic to me. (Remember some time ago there was a thread discussing the origin of that name? We could only guess then.)
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
In the early days of coating, B&W film made one pass through the coating machine, but color films made up to 7 passes. The statistical chance of increasing the static discharge problems was probably large. IDK. Color was also coated at higher speed due to the number of passes. And, as I said, rem-jet is very neutral in color, thus being ideal for color.

It may be that some early B&W films had a rem-jet back. Again IDK. I have no idea of the history of this backing. I would have to talk to a process historian at GEH.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom