Timmy, "3D subjects" is irrelevant.
For 2:1 you'll need 3 *f extension. 13" of bellows limits you to a 4" or so lens. 100 mm or so. So much for the 150s. With your camera the highest magnification you can get with a 150 is a little over 1:1.
For 1:2 you'll need 1.5 * f extension. A 150 will be fine for that.
According to Schneider, Componons, including the -S, are optimized for 10x enlargements. In taking, that's 1:10 facing normally and 10:1 reversed. Comparons are optimized for 2x - 6x, so will be better for the range you're interested in. If you are willing to get one, a 105/4.5 Comparon will do for you at 2:1. You might be better off with a 150/5.6 at 1:2. Both fit a #0 shutter, can easily be reversed by swapping the cells front to rear. To get the best all of the lenses you mentioned can give, they should be reversed above 1:1.
The Symmar will be worse closeup than a Componon, plain or -S.
Can't comment on the Rodagon, except that coverage may be a problem at 1:2. Can't comment on the 110/2.8 Mamiya either. Using it closeup doesn't seem like a good idea, but I could well be mistaken.
Why are you asking us instead of asking your lenses? When I want to know whether a lens is usable for macro, I bodge it in front of a Nikon and try it out. If it gives decent results its worth trying on a larger format, if not, well, 35 mm film is cheaper.
What are you going to use for a shutter?
