Lucky Color Film "First Look"

[Minolta93]

and I don't know why anyone shooting sheet film would want to gamble with it.

What does sheet film have to do with anything here?

 

[DREW WILEY]

Sheet film was mentioned earlier, as a wish list version of this same film, but probably incorrectly.

 

[dcy]

Gold a budget film? Maybe it's priced differently in the USA....over here it's pretty expensive compared to Color Plus which is definitely the nearest we have to a "budget" colour film.

At B&H Photo Kodak Gold and Color Plus are identically priced, at $8.49 for 35 mm roll of 36 exposures.

I know it's simply personal choice, and fits in with "diversity in palette" but I've never liked Gold. To my eyes it renders reds as brown, almost mud-like. So I'd certainly welcome more choice...even if I end up defaulting to Color Plus and Ultramax.

Interestingly, many people think that Gold and Color Plus look so similar that they've done tests and written long articles where they try to figure out if they are even different emulsions.

Kodak Gold vs. ColorPlus: Side-by-Side Comparison

Our extensive tests revealed no significant difference between the two emulsions. But there’s a slight nuance you may like to know about.

www.analog.cafe

 

[mshchem]

At B&H Photo Kodak Gold and Color Plus are identically priced, at $8.49 for 35 mm roll of 36 exposures.



Interestingly, many people think that Gold and Color Plus look so similar that they've done tests and written long articles where they try to figure out if they are even different emulsions.

Kodak Gold vs. ColorPlus: Side-by-Side Comparison

Our extensive tests revealed no significant difference between the two emulsions. But there’s a slight nuance you may like to know about.

www.analog.cafe

From a business perspective, does it serve the end user by using a different coating for these two films? I think just a different color box does the job.

I remember a friend who wouldn't use anything that didn't come in a green box.

 

[DREW WILEY]

I think what gave my mother's box Brownie Kodak Gold shots their special charm was that ants had crawled over the film box first. Plus she always tilted the camera about 15 degrees when she pushed the button. I can't recall a single picture that was level.

 

[Agulliver]

As far as I am aware it has long been established that Gold is a more modern emulsion, the first iteration of which was introduced as Kodacolor VR-G in the late 80s with the purpose of making photos taken on dull days look brighter and more colourful....holiday snaps, if you will. It does this but, to my eyes at least, looks much less pleasing than the previous Kodacolor VR which has somewhat more natural colours especially at the red end.

Kodak Color Plus has long been said to actually be Kodacolor VR....backed up by the fact that for as long as it's existed it's been sold in cassettes labelled "Kodacolor". No doubt it's been tweaked since 1986, but it's a simpler and less saturated/more neutral colour palette than Gold.

Horses for courses. Many people like Gold. I simply never have. Assuming I'm not unique in this perspective, there's a business case for both. Additionally, certainly across Europe, there's about a 20% price difference between the two in favour of Color Plus.

Anyhoo none of this really is relevant to the new Lucky film. Which looks promising. The relevance might be that they were believed to be also using a derivative of Kodacolor VR back when they were producing film under license from Kodak. If the new Lucky colour film is based on the knowledge gained during those days, it could well be similar to Kodacolor VR/Color Plus. Whether it sells in the West is going to depend on price, distribution, QC and how well disposed people are to buying Chinese film.

 

[dcy]

As far as I am aware it has long been established that Gold is a more modern emulsion, the first iteration of which was introduced as Kodacolor VR-G in the late 80s with the purpose of making photos taken on dull days look brighter and more colourful....holiday snaps, if you will. It does this but, to my eyes at least, looks much less pleasing than the previous Kodacolor VR which has somewhat more natural colours especially at the red end.

Kodak Color Plus has long been said to actually be Kodacolor VR....backed up by the fact that for as long as it's existed it's been sold in cassettes labelled "Kodacolor". No doubt it's been tweaked since 1986, but it's a simpler and less saturated/more neutral colour palette than Gold.

For what it's worth, I think I see a difference, and I buy Color Plus. But the article I linked to really has me questioning if this is all in my head.

Anyhoo none of this really is relevant to the new Lucky film. Which looks promising. The relevance might be that they were believed to be also using a derivative of Kodacolor VR back when they were producing film under license from Kodak. If the new Lucky colour film is based on the knowledge gained during those days, it could well be similar to Kodacolor VR/Color Plus. Whether it sells in the West is going to depend on price, distribution, QC and how well disposed people are to buying Chinese film.

Yeah. For me personally, I'm sure I'll buy a couple of rolls because I like to try everything once, but I doubt I will buy it regularly. Considering that any non-Kodak colour film is going to be worse quality than Kodak, my decision to buy is very close to a charitable donation and is influenced by whether I want Harman to expand its product line, or whether I feel that there's already too much manufacturing concentrated in China, and so on.