CBG
Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2004
- Messages
- 889
- Format
- Multi Format
I'm with Christopher.
I've used Totas more than any other light for 30 plus years and think they are a fabulous deal in power for the dollar. They are reliable, simple and easy to use, and with a bit of finesse can do all sorts of stuff no broadlight should be able to do.
I have no problem with the heat, since like all hot lights, ummm, they are hot, and I take that into consideration when I use them. I dunno what all this gloves thing is about, never needed them. I just don't hang onto the hot parts, I use the handles and such.
And yes, relamping is easy.
Of course you bounce them or diffuse them 99% of the time. That's what they are made for. They are lights, not modifiers. Arguing that they are bad since they need to be less specular is like arguing that cameras are defective since they need lenses to work.
Aiming them directly at a portrait subject is misusing broad lights. Of course, used direct, they are hot and harsh. That's why you diffuse or bounce.
If I need more oomph I use more than one to light up a surface. I often use six or seven to get enough light to get what I want. I am a hog for light.
I have used them just over and/or under the lens as a poor man's ringlight. A cheep hack, I admit, but it has worked. That's about the only time I have ever used them as direct lights.
They're great in a softbox or bounced or shot thru a tent....
I'm baffled by the people's experience that they break down or explode a lot. What are they doing? For me, in thirty plus years not a single lamp breakage. Not one. Never.
In my experience - they are more reliable than I could have imagined. Never a total failure while shooting in thirty years. Of course it will happen tomorrow.
They are not invulnerable. Two of my three original totas are gradually showing they will sometime need a repair - the plug holder in the housing has cracked and will need for the plugholder to be removed and replaced. They still function well but you can see they'll need work sometime. Lowell offers to do repairs, so what's the issue? I doubt any light will work forever without some sort of maintenence sometime. As I have found deals on Totas in the last year or two, I've snapped them up so now I have a couple extra so I can send the original two to get fixed without being held back.
They fulfill one major lighting need - power in a compact package. Great for all sorts of work from studio to architecture to film to TV to general bouncing and softboxing. What's not to like?
Combined with a few other hot lights, you can do anything. By themselves a great beginner's kit. The stands are wimpy but usable and light enough to make a portable three light kit.
If you're doing portraiture in 8x10, I'd be inclined to add to consideration a really good strobe setup, since people cannot generally be themselves during longish exposures. Really good means a truly proportional and powerful modelling light, scads of reflectors and accessories avaliable, and gobs and gobs of power - expensive. Broncolor perhaps?
Best,
C
I've used Totas more than any other light for 30 plus years and think they are a fabulous deal in power for the dollar. They are reliable, simple and easy to use, and with a bit of finesse can do all sorts of stuff no broadlight should be able to do.
I have no problem with the heat, since like all hot lights, ummm, they are hot, and I take that into consideration when I use them. I dunno what all this gloves thing is about, never needed them. I just don't hang onto the hot parts, I use the handles and such.
And yes, relamping is easy.
Of course you bounce them or diffuse them 99% of the time. That's what they are made for. They are lights, not modifiers. Arguing that they are bad since they need to be less specular is like arguing that cameras are defective since they need lenses to work.
Aiming them directly at a portrait subject is misusing broad lights. Of course, used direct, they are hot and harsh. That's why you diffuse or bounce.
If I need more oomph I use more than one to light up a surface. I often use six or seven to get enough light to get what I want. I am a hog for light.
I have used them just over and/or under the lens as a poor man's ringlight. A cheep hack, I admit, but it has worked. That's about the only time I have ever used them as direct lights.
They're great in a softbox or bounced or shot thru a tent....
I'm baffled by the people's experience that they break down or explode a lot. What are they doing? For me, in thirty plus years not a single lamp breakage. Not one. Never.
In my experience - they are more reliable than I could have imagined. Never a total failure while shooting in thirty years. Of course it will happen tomorrow.
They are not invulnerable. Two of my three original totas are gradually showing they will sometime need a repair - the plug holder in the housing has cracked and will need for the plugholder to be removed and replaced. They still function well but you can see they'll need work sometime. Lowell offers to do repairs, so what's the issue? I doubt any light will work forever without some sort of maintenence sometime. As I have found deals on Totas in the last year or two, I've snapped them up so now I have a couple extra so I can send the original two to get fixed without being held back.
They fulfill one major lighting need - power in a compact package. Great for all sorts of work from studio to architecture to film to TV to general bouncing and softboxing. What's not to like?
Combined with a few other hot lights, you can do anything. By themselves a great beginner's kit. The stands are wimpy but usable and light enough to make a portable three light kit.
If you're doing portraiture in 8x10, I'd be inclined to add to consideration a really good strobe setup, since people cannot generally be themselves during longish exposures. Really good means a truly proportional and powerful modelling light, scads of reflectors and accessories avaliable, and gobs and gobs of power - expensive. Broncolor perhaps?
Best,
C