WIth SLRs I dont understand why people want old SLRs. Yea it looks cool but considering "for example' an ELAN 7s and similar are pretty much perfect and have autofocus old SLRs are a not fun. Manual Focusing on most 35 slrs is a pain.
I use film primarily to slow down my photography and only secondly for the look and feel. Therefore a manual SLR is a must for me. If I got a modern SLR with program AE, AF and auto advance I could just go with the "newer technology" I am not allowed to talk about in this forum. Rangefinders on the other hand are just not my cup of tea, so it's down to old SLRs.
Everyone defines their photography for themselves. People are dipping film into coffee, I would never do this, but I can understand people who are doing this.
and a plain prism Nikon F or two.
I may be interested. PM me.
I just bought Huss's Nikon S2. You should jump at the opportunity - he has great gear. Besides, there's no reason for me to be the only one with a thin wallet!
From a new moderator's position, more of this approach would be really nice.don't want to harsh anyone's mellow.
The perfect mechanical SLR is whatever I happen to be selling. Right now, it is the Nikon FM, the Nikkormat FT2 (black), and a plain prism Nikon F or two. Hmm, also have a perfect condition Minolta SR1s, which is just gorgeous. And mechanical..
I bought a Nikkor S Auto 35mm f2.8 from him to use on my EL. There is very little about this lens posted online.
The perfect mechanical SLR is whatever I happen to be selling. Right now, it is the Nikon FM, the Nikkormat FT2 (black), and a plain prism Nikon F or two. Hmm, also have a perfect condition Minolta SR1s, which is just gorgeous. And mechanical..
I used to practice a lot back in the late 70's when I used the Nikon F2. Today I think I often do it with my DSLR and I can do it in about 5 secs but sometimes longer to set exposure and focus. I am older now and the DSLR ground glass doesn't look as good as the F2 ground glass. I guess because they imbedded a layer of LCD on the focusing screen to indicate the focus point that makes it harder for manual focus.I have never timed myself. The thought has never crossed my mind.
No "perfect" cameras out there, but with an SLR I like a Nikon F/F2 with an eye level prism. Relatively light weight (depending on lens), fits in the hand nice, cheap and good optics, especially for B&W work. Some new optics too in F mount (not for me). I shot a Leicaflex SL system fairly exclusively for a 5-6 year period. Great optics, beautiful viewfinder, excellent breaking system, but heavy and some reliability issues. I now prefer meter less cameras and lighter.
Too bad it's not a MInolta SR2 . . .
The F2 is not a light weight, with a motor drive a heavy system, the F3 was lighter, still there was something about the F2 I missed when I upgraded to the F3P.
I guess it's relative - I usually shoot with a Nikon D850 most of the time and when I pick up my Nikon F2as it feels featherweight by comparison.
With or without the motor drive?
WIth SLRs I dont understand why people want old SLRs. Yea it looks cool but considering "for example' an ELAN 7s and similar are pretty much perfect and have autofocus old SLRs are a not fun. Manual Focusing on most 35 slrs is a pain.
Bigger than some, and smaller than others:I'm guessing the Elan 7s with eye focus?
That big bulky camera which needs a very expensive battery unless one lucks into the big bulky battery grip.
Isn't this the Canon with the plastic mode dial which easily snapped and fell off?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?