What is the list of features and specifications required to be a high end camera?
" more FPS - more finder, spot metering and and more complicated metering"The least you could do is tell me what I should be looking for so I can distinguish a high end camera from an ordinary camera or a low end camera. Is it that it has both manual and automatic exposure, spot and average metering, takes a motor drive, has auto focus, a 1/8000 top shutter speed, blah, blah, blah? What is the list of features and specifications required to be a high end camera?
so those cameras have no plastic parts and can hold a CLA for 15 years of constant use ? you never answered my question why those cameras you mentioned" more FPS - more finder, spot metering and and more complicated metering"
They are better designed with modern technology and materials and will last a long time being banged and dropped. Not only compared to older rangefinders but also older SLRs.so those cameras have no plastic parts and can hold a CLA for 15 years of constant use ? you never answered my question why those cameras you mentioned
were so much better than a M3... ( as mentioned I and speaking for my personal experience with a camera I own, not gobbledygook I read and reposted on the internet ).
I have never owned a plastic blob camera, and have no desire to do so, but I do know that their plastic bodies can crack if dropped. A friend of mine has one and he has black tape covering the cracks to keep out stray light. Maybe black tape is like patina to plastic blob camera enthusiasts.They are better designed with modern technology and materials and will last a long time being banged and dropped. Not only compared to older rangefinders but also older SLRs.
Yeah. I'm not too sure any camera, plastic or not, likes being dropped. I know I have gotten away with that mistake a couple of times but I certainly don't intend to make a habit of it.I have never owned a plastic blob camera, and have no desire to do so, but I do know that their plastic bodies can crack if dropped. A friend of mine has one and he has black tape covering the cracks to keep out stray light. Maybe black tape is like patina to plastic blob camera enthusiasts.
My Nikon F5 which was the earlier version of the F6 which I think you can consider them of equivalent in durability. It's 19 year old now and it looks and works like when it was new. Now it's not 100% metal. It's made of many different materials.as mentioned, im not familiar with those cameras and at the risk of seeming argumentative, I will apologize in advance.
there's no plastic on them, and they are all metal bodies ? and a cla on the shutter and lenses will last 18-20 years?
that's how I would compare a modern camera like you have examples of, and a m3 ... not really sure how else to compare them other than materials and reliability / how often they need to be CLA'd ..
I don't have experience with any other M3's other than the one I own. the shutter is spot on, it was CLA'd probably in 2003
and when I asked the person who did it when I needed to bring them ( the camera and lenses ) back he said when my kid graduates college ( she was 3 at the time ) ...
IDK. I won't trade my M3 for a injection molded plastic electronic camera. Maybe you would, but I'll keep snapping away with what I have.
Thanks for your response.
John
Difficult to imagine the perfect mechanical SLR made out of plastic.
What is the name of this thread again?
Oh yeah.. "Looking for the perfect mechanical SLR".
I think I am going to go to a barbecue website and tell everyone they should be eating veggies.
Lets see leica survive this:
All I said "which started this whole thing" was when it comes to SLRs, modern once with autofocus and alll bells and whistles is IMHO a better choice.
Unless you want to look cool to the people passing you buy.
Lets see leica survive this:
The shutter and winding worked. imagine it is a film camera.What did those DIGITAL cameras survive? Did you notice that the back screens were instantly broken. And more telling, did you notice that he did not show if they actually took pictures? ie he just showed that they made clicking sounds.
He did not show any results...
And even more telling, those cameras were deemed so worthless that he had no problem taking a blow torch to them! Frankly, I don't blame him.
The shutter and winding worked. imagine it is a film camera.
What did those DIGITAL cameras survive? Did you notice that the back screens were instantly broken. And more telling, did you notice that he did not show if they actually took pictures?
I am supposed to be impressed by a YouTube video of someone lighting their camera on fire?
Is it supposed to simulate someone being stuck in a volcano or in a house fire ? I don't really see the point.
I don't plan on wasting effort on that, I'd rather waste my time making photographs, thanks.
and computer / electronics driven cameras that you say are the best, really aren't mechanical cameras. they don't work without
batteries and electronics, have motor drives ( it seems ). .. nothing really mechanical about them.
I don't really photograph so people will notice me, or try to look cool when people pass me by ...
as I said, im glad you like your cameras, I'll be more than happy with mine.
Lets see leica survive this:
and as I said I would rather have a solid metal bodied camera, not a piece of plastic, I would rather have a mechanical camera not something that runs on batteriesAgain... It was not a "like a camera" argument. You can like any camera. I fell a certain way shooting with certain cameras.
It was an argument about the supirior durability of modern SLRs compared to old mechanical SLRs.
.. not sure how a plastic slr could be superior compared to a M3.
You just don't get it, do you? You don't...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?