It's easy to hand hold with the WLF. I use the 65 for street and architecture, the lenses Mamiya made last both RB and RZ were jazzed up, some have floating lens internals for close range correction. I have a 50mm for my Hasselblads, with the floating element, it's truly spectacular. Some RB lenses are 50 years old, they can be repaired, but I bought one for my RZ 20 years back. I found a nice man who had trained in Japan, he was based in California. Even then the shutters weren't available, he made his own parts to rebuild my slow shutter, cost me 300 bucks plus the original cost of the lens.Thanks for the info, I was wondering what three lenses should be at the top of my list! What did you use the 65mm for? Also, I suppose everyone has their own experiences and opinions on things and I'm just trying to create some for myself. I don't know why but I'm exceptionally optimistic of my handheld use of such a brick, I carry A tripod with me most days even when just using my EOS 5!
...I don't think much of this! The guy is wandering around with the film mag multi exposure tab pushed forward (and hoping he doesn't forget to wind on). Because of the RBs safety interlocks it's almost impossible to screw up. If you haven't got a left side grip, it's possible to use the strap to cradle the camera - making it more stable. Just basic, sound, technique.I've owned an RB67 for thirty years. I always use it on my landscape shot on a tripod. But this guy likes to walk around with it. He also owns an RZ67 so you could look for his videos on Youtube as well.
I've been shooting my RB67 for thirty years and still double expose on occasion. The earlier models have no interlocks to prevent that other than a little red dot often missed in the rush of shooting, or forgetting where one left the camera the last time you shot it. He obviously was new to the RB67. He didn't know how to turn the back to switch it to portrait mode. But you can't miss his enthusiasm which is probably one the most important things about photography or anything else....I don't think much of this! The guy is wandering around with the film mag multi exposure tab pushed forward (and hoping he doesn't forget to wind on). Because of the RBs safety interlocks it's almost impossible to screw up. If you haven't got a left side grip, it's possible to use the strap to cradle the camera - making it more stable. Just basic, sound, technique.
I never used the 127 on the RB, so I can't comment on it in relation to the 110. There are a few quirks that make me want the Pro II, but like you I can't justify the extra price tag. I've been very happy with the results I get from my RZ Pro, so I don't think you'll find you can't live without the Pro II.Firstly thank you so much, I feel like your response alone has certainly made the most impact on my incredible indecisive nature! Would you say it is worth buying the PRO II or would one of the earlier models suffice? Just that the market for a PRO II seems very inflated at the minute! Also, I love the 110mm lens from what I've looked at, however, supposedly the 127mm for the RB67 is equally as satisfying to some! I would love to hear your personal thoughts on this, also the photo of the dog has just made my day, I have a million photos of peoples dogs on 35mm, they usually tend to be my favourite thing to shoot!
I never used the 127 on the RB, so I can't comment on it in relation to the 110. There are a few quirks that make me want the Pro II, but like you I can't justify the extra price tag. I've been very happy with the results I get from my RZ Pro, so I don't think you'll find you can't live without the Pro II.
Another image to tantalize you - this was with the 37mm fisheye. It's very much a specialty lens, not for everyone, and not something you're likely to carry in your bag just in case - it's a HEAVY sucker
So, if you don't mind (1) keeping your eyes constantly open, (2) buying from international sellers, and (3) assembling your own kit from a variety of sources instead of buying it all in one go--full kits seem to sell for a significant premium--it's *possible* to assemble a reasonably priced kit for portraiture and closeups at least.
Unfortunately, the other two lenses I've got my eye on to give me a good spread of focal lengths are *really* expensive right now. I'm wanting the 90mm as my "normal" lens, but it's silly costly, and the 50mm (non-ULD) is not so bad, but still pretty expensive. I'll have to wait on those.
OR shot a Hasselblad or other 6x6 and the need for a rotating back vaporizes.
But if you shoot mostly non-square aspect ratios, might as well just buy a 645 vs. cropping all those 6x6 shots. I like negs as big as possible (I seem to use masking with most every print), the RB has been great for me for about 20+ years. To each their own I suppose!
I like negatives as large as possible so I would never use a 645 format. To me it is too long just like 35mm.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?