Thanks for the suggestion but Ireland's customs is crazy and ordering from America would be a death sentence to my already unhealthy student wallet! I think I will be considering Japan if anything!
I want to take general, day-to-day photos on my travels. I also adore taking photos of my friends when we are together, mostly at night time and I do a lot of nighttime photography on busy streets (when the pandemic climate wasn't so restrictive). I would usually use a 540ex with my EOS 5.
Unfortunately, I won't be in the US anytime soon but that is a great suggestion either way!Fly to the US, buy the camera, return home. When you go through Customs, if they ask, say, "This old thing? I have had it for years. It came with me to the US."
What lenses were you using with your Canon EOS 5 and 540ex flash?
Assuming you still have the lenses and flash, why not just buy a 35mm Canon film camera that uses the Canon lenses you still have?
What do you hope to accomplish that you were unable to do with the EOS 5 system you had?
I used to own an RZ67 and three lenses, 50mm ULD, 110mm and 180mm. I loved the camera and the optics were great. I sold it all to finance my large format gear.
My best piece of advice whether buying an RZ or RB would be to purchase the "L" grip. The grip makes the camera so much more enjoyable to shoot hand held.
You say you want to use this camera for travel. The cameras are large and heavy and so are the lenses. Just be aware of this. People shoot them hand held all the time but carrying them around for a full day of sightseeing would not be fun.
I have a bunch of RZ67II stuff, 2 bodies, lenses, backs. For a while you could buy EX+ 120 backs from KEH for $125 USD. That time has passed. I remember when the RB came out in the 70's, I wanted one so bad. I bought my first RZ67II in 1999, new, cost $3000.00 with waist level finder. I bought a left hand grip I shot 1000's of pictures with just the standard 110mm f2.8 lens. If you want a eye level prism, forget carrying around the prism for the RZ67II it weighs a ton. I love those cameras.
I also have, being retired and no dependents, a few Hasselblad cameras and several lenses. If you are going to buy something well used, the blads, are, IMHO, the way to go. No bellows, easier to service etc.
I really like both systems. One other wrinkle, something to consider is a 645 camera. I shot a heck of a lot with a Bronica ETRSi, with the right hand grip and a simple no meter prism it handles almost like a 35mm.
I buy stuff from Japan, never had a problem. But you need to read the fine print. If there's not a lot of pictures, usually means they don't want you to see something.
MAP Camera in Japan has to be the biggest, I bought a Nikon D5 from them and it was spotless and perfect for a nice price.
If you can't lay your hands on the camera, you need to make sure you have an experienced seller.
The rotating back is very good. Especially if you are using waist level finder or simply hand held. Instead of a prism consider a chimney finder, I have one that's an ancient RB model, most RB finders fit both RZ models. And you can use RB lenses on the RZ.Thank you very much for all of the info, very much appreciated. I never knew about the weight of the RZ prism. I have been looking at the Mamiya645 although I feel like my heart lies more so akin to the 6x7 dimensions achievable with the larger bodies. I also really like the rotatable back for quickly changing to portrait or landscape available for RB/RZ series. From what I have read that is not an option for the mamiya645.
One of the nice features of the RZ is that when the magnifier pops up it does create something similar to a chimney finder.The rotating back is very good. Especially if you are using waist level finder or simply hand held. Instead of a prism consider a chimney finder, I have one that's an ancient RB model, most RB finders fit both RZ models. And you can use RB lenses on the RZ.
And you can use RB lenses on the RZ.
Agree 100%. The chimney finder does have adjustable diopter/magnifier which can come in handyOne of the nice features of the RZ is that when the magnifier pops up it does create something similar to a chimney finder.
Agree 100%. The chimney finder does have adjustable diopter/magnifier which can come in handy
Interesting- I have a young co-worker about LennyOne’s age and I brought both my RZ67 kit along with a Rolleiflex 3.5f for him to try out. He did not relate to the Rollei at all, but loved the RZ. I am old and I much prefer using the TLR when walking around. The RZ is much more versatile and I love it too- but it’s a brick! I am thinking it might be at least partly an age thing with 30’s-‘50’s tech just feeling too foreign to the younger set.
I’m sure there are plenty of worn out RZs out there, but the one I bought here on Apug a couple of years ago is pretty much mint- so they are out there, and the lenses I have bought mostly from Japan have been darn close to mint as well (and so cheap! Compare them to late model Hasselblad glass).
I totally agree about the 110 2.8. This was all I had for several years. Next was a 180mm for portrait work, then 65mm. I have the left hand grip for both of my bodies. For a camera that often spends it's life on a tripod, mine didn't.
I used to shoot with an RB, but replaced it with an RZ. The reason was that my RB needed repairs but several repair services I went to all said that it was not cost-effective to repair it, if they would even service it at all. Ditto that for backs for the RB. I also did not like the combination of having to manually re-cock the shutter/body and advance the film manually as separate actions. The "fix" for it was to get one of the motorized backs, but that then added a LOT of weight (four AA batteries plus the motor in the back). I now shoot with an RZ - the only caveat with it is keep a spare battery in the bag for it because it will get wonky when the battery gets low. But I have used it for street shooting when traveling - I took it with me to Mexico City and walked around with it. I also shot some of the March For Our Lives in DC a few years ago to protest gun violence. The protest shots were done with the 65mm lens.
This shot was with the 50mm, hand-held, looking up at the interior of the dome of the Palacio De Bellas Artes in Mexico City. Exposure was about 1/15th of a second.
This was shot with the 180 (yes, I was nuts enough to bring the 180 with me in my bag, but at that time I only had the 50, 110 and 180 lenses!)
So, anyway, you can see that it travels well, and the bulk and weight may actually prove to be an advantage when hand-holding because they help dampen movement and vibration. The closing shot was on a tripod, I'm almost certain - I've got steady hands, but I don't think I'm THAT steady. This was from the 110 f2.8 lens. Another reason to get the RZ - if you have only one lens for the camera, THAT lens is the reason to get the RZ rather than the RB. The 110 was new to the RZ. If someone held a gun to my head and said "pick one and only one lens to keep for your RZ" I would have no hesitation in choosing the 110.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?