Looking for a fast lens

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 6
  • 3
  • 61
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 1
  • 68
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 6
  • 0
  • 87
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 109
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 79

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,842
Messages
2,781,712
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

edtbjon

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
391
Format
Medium Format
Another shout-out for the 110 f/2.0 for the 'blad. The earlier F (not FE) lenses are available at not too ridiculous prices and the same goes for 2000 (different incarnations) camera houses. Last but not least, it's a nice lens which I liked much for portraiture.
Sometimes there are auctions etc. for e.g. a 2000FCW with a 110 and possibly other F lenses too, so that you can get it all in one single buy. All the lenses (except the standard Planar 80mm) are fast(er) lenses, but still very good Zeiss glass.

//Björn
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
the 110 can cover 4x5 with movements at close focus?? How close are we talking here?

Well it almost covers 4x5 at infinity. At portrait distances I think it would for sure. I can check if you need to know.

Regarding bellows, I found I could easily get to 1:1 on my 5x7 camera without any heroics. At 1:1 the lens easily covers 5x7.

Several of the rb lenses cover much larger circles than the 6x8cm back requires. With some minor modifications I found that I could do close to 8x8cm squares on sheet film, using a pro SD body. But the whole thing is a lot easier if you just put the lens on a sturdy LF body. For that I use the rittreck 5x7, which is about as stable and sturdy as an rb.

Anyway, (there was a url link here which no longer exists) was done with the rz 110/2.8 on the Rittreck on 5x7 film.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Keith, where did you get your RZ lens mount for view cameras? I would love to try your methods with my 110 2.8 on my 4x5 (Sinar) and 5x7 (Kodak No. 2).
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Keith, where did you get your RZ lens mount for view cameras? I would love to try your methods with my 110 2.8 on my 4x5 (Sinar) and 5x7 (Kodak No. 2).

I made the mount, it was very easy.

I glued a body cap to a lens rear cap, back to back. After that cured, I drilled out a 1.75" center hole through both with a hole saw. Placing the rear cap on the 110 lens, you will be delighted to find that there is now a 1/8" ridge (near my thumb in photo #3, attached) between the lens' fastener ring and the homemade thing. The ridge grabs a 1/8" lensboard when you rotate the ring. All you do is drill out a 3.75" hole in the lensboard and then you have an easy way to put any rz or rb lens on your view camera. No screws, no nothin'... just rotate the ring to put it on or take it off.

Honestly I didn't make this adapter to use it with a view camera. I made it to adapt rz lens to an rb. But then after an hour of work I realized that simply removing a pin on the rz lenses allows them to go on the rb :rolleyes:

Erie Patsellis has a fancier approach that involves removing the lens mount from an rb (cocking mechanism and all) and putting that on a lensboard. That method allows you to cock and fire the leaf shutter on the rb lenses. In my case, I just hand shuttered. But I have an Erie gizmo too. I am just thinking that I might be able to electronically fire the RZ lens if I put my mind to it. Another project for another day. Anyway, I suspect that the rb lenses generally have more coverage than the comparable rz lenses. The 127 KL, for example, seems to cover 4x5 better than the 110.

Oh, you can do the same hooplah with the mamiya 645 lenses... or small format lenses... or whatever brings you joy. Just for kicks I have mounted the 80/1.9 and the Nikon 50/1.2 in this way.

Have fun!
 

Attachments

  • rz adapter-0898-1.jpg
    rz adapter-0898-1.jpg
    88.1 KB · Views: 78
  • rz adapter-0899-2.jpg
    rz adapter-0899-2.jpg
    90 KB · Views: 84
  • rz adapter-0900-3.jpg
    rz adapter-0900-3.jpg
    100.6 KB · Views: 89

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
If I were you I would not bother with hunting down a faster lens.
With all the real estate that larger formats offer you, why not just use a faster film?
The 800 speed color films are excellent and in Black and White you can go to 1600 and 3200!
 

Venchka

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
692
Location
Wood County, Texas
Format
35mm
What he said. ^^^^ With Tri-X and Rodinal and no agitation, I'm not sure anyone has found the upper limits yet.
 
OP
OP
Bosaiya

Bosaiya

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
396
Location
Sumner, Wash
Format
4x5 Format
I'm not opposed to using Delta 3200, I've used enough of it to get a good idea of what it can do. I just don't really think it has that much personality.

Right now I'm stand developing Neopan 400 in Rodinal for 90min with no agitation after the first bit.
 

fatboy22

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
397
Location
Iowa City, I
Format
Multi Format
I'm looking for a fast MF lens. Right now I'm chugging along at f/2.8 but I'm really drooling over some of those Leica Noctilux f/1.0 lenses.

Try the Norita 66 camera with standard 80mm f 2.0. It is very much like the
Noctilux f/1.0 lenses of Leica. Norita 66 cameras are getting more rare to find but if you get a good one you will be hooked. I have 3 of them and they have grown to be my favorite medium format camera system. I also shoot Bronica S2a, Pentax 67, Bessa III rangefinder, Pentacon Six with east german Ziess glass.



Jamie
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,807
Location
Plymouth. UK
Format
Multi Format
I'm looking for a fast MF lens. Right now I'm chugging along at f/2.8 but I'm really drooling over some of those Leica Noctilux f/1.0 lenses.

I realize the caveats with regard to cost, DOF, quality, etc. This is for a very specific project.

I'd be thrilled with any links or recommendations. To quote A. Eldritch "Give me something fast"
You might be better off just using a 35mm Camera with a fast lens. A high-end 35mm lens with modern films is capable of truly excellent quality if it is used thoughtfully.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/35mm-f14-asph.htm
 

cramej

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
1,235
Format
Multi Format
I imagine any lens made for 6x4.5 would have to cover 6x6, so that's not a bad idea. It would certainly fit in with the rest of my Frankencameras!
Not quite. The diagonal for a 6x6 negative is nearly a centimeter longer so the image circle has to be larger to cover 6x6. I can't say for sure that the 80mm f/1.9 covers 6x6 or not but it can't be assumed.

Edit: Well, I just noticed that this thread was resurrected from the graveyard. Oops.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom