That's how you settle that
I thought I'd append a bit to my original post by saying I've decided to cut out the middleman and just drop a film camera into my son's hands. I bought a nice little F3 off the 'bay from some really great people, a 24mm f/2.8 from the equally nice people at KEH, and he gets the 50mm that I just never seem to use anymore. Just about any other glass he'll need he can borrow from me. I'm giving him my old domke bag, which is pretty ragged but less ragged than the one I use. (I was informed that "ragged" looked really cool. Not surprising, coming from the son of a guy who never wanted to wear new shoes home from the store...) And a handful of Tri-X. He doesn't yet know this is going to happen. The family is taking a little road trip to New Mexico and he's going to find out just as we pull away from the curb.
Some of the reason for this shortcut is that I've been reading the posts here on APUG and they have reminded me that seeing and taking pictures is as much fun, and as fulfilling, as the image itself, that instant gratification can be ultimately empty. I see this as a golden opportunity to alter his nascent approach to image making. To slow him down and teach him to really see things, not just bang away when the light's green and then chimp it. To help him realize he has 36 chances to get it "right", not a thousand, and that the "wrong" one's are sometimes what he was really after if only he knew it at the time.
I had it backwards. It's not digital-to-analog, but analog-to-digital that I needed. Next year in high school photo class I imagine there will be a need for digital; I don't know if they have a darkroom, but we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. Worse case is he'll abandon film for digital and I'll inherit that F3. Poor me. Thanks for all the responses, they really helped.
sa