Lomography introduces pre-aged film!

dmr

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
868
Format
35mm
Looks like it's Ferrania. I didn't really care for it when it was fresh. Maybe it improves with age?
 

TattyJJ

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2016
Messages
153
Location
Hampshire, UK
Format
35mm
Sounds a bit more like "We bought a big chunk of film, but totally forgot it was at the back of the freezer for 7 years and are now going to try get rid of it"
 
OP
OP

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
They are going to sell all of it to young,happy, fun loving customers.
I don't think APUG is the target audience..


$5/roll aint bad considering they are being up front as to what you are getting, and people eagerly pay more for that on ebay.
I think almost all the film I have is expired. Hasn't bothered me yet.
 

Ektagraphic

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,927
Location
Southeastern
Format
Medium Format
Next thing you know, they'll be selling jeans with holes already in them
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,772
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Hmmmm... Maybe I should sell them my 2 x 250 foot x 6 inch rolls of panatomic x aerial film with a 1970's expiration date!
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,748
Format
35mm
Hmmmm... Maybe I should sell them my 2 x 250 foot x 6 inch rolls of panatomic x aerial film with a 1970's expiration date!

I'll take some off yer hands.

I just got a few rolls of Max 800 expired sometime around 2006 and a Lloyd's loader with a half roll of something in it. No clue what is in it...Rodinal here we come!

So you're saying my freezer of expired film is worth selling and then buying fresh film? We'll blow me down blind and strike my knee! Yeehaa! There's silver in them there freezer!
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,772
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Well, the base is only about 1.5 mils, so unless you have a vacuum back on your camera, it's not going to work well...
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,450
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
Film is like meat or produce. They all go bad with time.

PE

I recall finding a thread about the Kodak MAX 800 when it was improved (2008-10) with you and Ron Andrews in p.net. The most interesting fact was that being one of the fastest Kodak CN films, a few months already made a difference in the film and storage could be noticeable.
Lomography CN films are most probably Kodak contract production and I don't know if they could be the Kodak Gold films that are no longer house brand produced... Gold 100 and Max 800.

Dave mentioned something that Lomo took good care of the jumbo (refrigerated), so perhaps it may be rather OK. Still, I prefer to buy fresh film; the Kodak made CN!
 

Agulliver

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
3,576
Location
Luton, United Kingdom
Format
Multi Format
We're mostly not the target audience....from what I remember the Ferrania 400 film was a bit grainy but perfectly usable. I burned through a ton of it as the Truprint house brand, getting free rolls when I sent films to them for processing. The grain was the only issue, tones and colours were good. It was fine for 6x4 prints but not great for anything much bigger...and did not respond too well to under exposure. I used it because it was effectively free, when I bought a 400 speed film it was always Fujji Superia.

As a film for lomography it's probably pretty ideal...the grain will work with the simple lenses of the lomo style cameras. I guess your $5 a roll includes the costs of freezing the stuff for 7 years!
 

David T T

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
187
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
They are going to sell all of it to young,happy, fun loving customers.
I don't think APUG is the target audience..

Lol! I'm certainly none of the above!
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
Film is like meat or produce. They all go bad with time.

PE

I remember reading, many years ago, that Kodak "pro" films were essentially aged to close to an optimum point, then delivered to "pro" retailers who kept them refrigerated so they'd stay near that point. True (at least then)?
 

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
I remember reading, many years ago, that Kodak "pro" films were essentially aged to close to an optimum point, then delivered to "pro" retailers who kept them refrigerated so they'd stay near that point. True (at least then)?

In my experience at Kodak, 'Pro' films weren't really aged and were expected to be kept refrigerated by the retailers and photographers to maintain quality. "Amateur' films were expected to receive 'rough' handling and poor storage conditions in use and were 'pre-aged' by Kodak to minimize changes seen by the user over the life of a roll of film.
 

Leigh B

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,059
Location
Maryland, USA
Format
Multi Format
Back when I was designing electronic equipment, there was a saying in the Marketing Department:

"If you can't fix it, feature it."

Which means if it does something unexpected and you can't correct that, put a positive spin on it and advertise it.

- Leigh
 

tezzasmall

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
1,137
Location
Southend on Sea Essex UK
Format
Plastic Cameras
I continue to laugh at Lomo's antics but if they've got the cheek to dress up the descriptions and people are willing to pay the prices asked, who are we to say otherwise?
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
there was someone here on apug a few years ago who was selling
expired film for more than fresh film. he also suggested he
supplied LOMO with some of their expired-stuff...
they have been selling expired film for years.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…