High PH will cause higher contrast in B&W films, and in color film it causes higher dye formation (and a bit of contrast). I assume that the Lomochrome Purple film had so much excess dye that it leaked out and got absorbed by the regular color film.The modified ECN-2 process may also have contributed to the issue.
What was the other film?
It is hard to explain that any affect from one film to another should just take place in such band.
I wonder if the old film might also be designed for C-22, not C-41 (or ECN-2).
Perhaps you should have asked a question instead of making a statement. There are so many problems here that stating an absolute conclusion like in your title is irresponsible.
Only happened on one roll of film.
Expired from the 80s.
Cross processed.
Bastardized process too.
"last of many" through the developer.
Never do two at a time. Did you have enough developer in the tank?
And looking at the neg, possible lack of agitation.
From the neg you show it just looks like poor development of really old film that was underexposed and developed in a process it wasn't designed for, and your chems might even be exhausted. If there was carryover from the LOMO film then the whole neg would have tended towards the green, not the magenta that the center is, but color couplers dispersed in a developer would be so dilute I don't see how they could affect another film. Like I said, the film is just really old. Color film from the 80s, even if it was frozen, is going to have color shifts and will exhibit the striping, even if developed correctly. Almost all the old films I find in cameras exhibit the striping. I just see so many issues that would easily explain the problem that blaming the LOMO film is about the last thing that would cause your neg to look that way.
Perhaps you should have asked a question instead of making a statement. There are so many problems here that stating an absolute conclusion like in your title is irresponsible.
Only happened on one roll of film.
Expired from the 80s.
Cross processed.
Bastardized process too.
"last of many" through the developer.
Never do two at a time. Did you have enough developer in the tank?
And looking at the neg, possible lack of agitation.
From the neg you show it just looks like poor development of really old film that was underexposed and developed in a process it wasn't designed for, and your chems might even be exhausted. If there was carryover from the LOMO film then the whole neg would have tended towards the green, not the magenta that the center is, but color couplers dispersed in a developer would be so dilute I don't see how they could affect another film. Like I said, the film is just really old. Color film from the 80s, even if it was frozen, is going to have color shifts and will exhibit the striping, even if developed correctly. Almost all the old films I find in cameras exhibit the striping. I just see so many issues that would easily explain the problem that blaming the LOMO film is about the last thing that would cause your neg to look that way.
Perhaps you should have asked a question instead of making a statement. There are so many problems here that stating an absolute conclusion like in your title is irresponsible.
Only happened on one roll of film.
Expired from the 80s.
Cross processed.
Bastardized process too.
"last of many" through the developer.
Never do two at a time. Did you have enough developer in the tank?
And looking at the neg, possible lack of agitation.
From the neg you show it just looks like poor development of really old film that was underexposed and developed in a process it wasn't designed for, and your chems might even be exhausted. If there was carryover from the LOMO film then the whole neg would have tended towards the green, not the magenta that the center is, but color couplers dispersed in a developer would be so dilute I don't see how they could affect another film. Like I said, the film is just really old. Color film from the 80s, even if it was frozen, is going to have color shifts and will exhibit the striping, even if developed correctly. Almost all the old films I find in cameras exhibit the striping. I just see so many issues that would easily explain the problem that blaming the LOMO film is about the last thing that would cause your neg to look that way.
So are we all of the opinion that Lomography Purple does not, per se, infect other film with its purple? That's key here for the OP and anyone of us who might want to combine two films( Lomography Purple and ordinary film ) in the tank?
pentaxuser
I've processed Lomochrome Purple alongside normal C41 film multiple times with no ill effects.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?