Lodima Fine Art Paper--Official reports and Member Responses

c6h6o3

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
My daughter says that there's a package waiting for me at home from Smith / Chamlee photography...I wonder what that can be
 

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
UPS truck just blew by going 1000 miles per hour. Not today.
 

Barry S

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
1,350
Location
DC Metro
Format
Large Format
Mine came, but damn!--I need to get some amidol and the other 800 essential ingredients for this paper's princely bath.
 

c6h6o3

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
Barry S said:
Mine came, but damn!--I need to get some amidol and the other 800 essential ingredients for this paper's princely bath.
Click to expand...

I live in Gaithersburg. What do you need? I have pounds of everything (as in hypo, amidol, KBr, Na bisulfite, citric acid and Na sulfite). You'll have to fend for yourself on the rest.
 

JLP

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,608
Location
Oregon
Format
Multi Format
Mine came, but damn!--I need to get some amidol and the other 800 essential ingredients for this paper's princely bath.
Click to expand...

You have been waiting for this paper and have no soup to cook it in?????
Time to get your life in order


jan
 

Barry S

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
1,350
Location
DC Metro
Format
Large Format
Jim--wow, thanks for the kind offer. I'll definitely take you up on it and will PM you about finding a time.

Jan--Sorry, my priorities are clearly mixed up.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
NYC has Lodima.
 

skillian

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
277
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Format
8x10 Format
Made my first prints on Lodima tonight. Overall, very pleased. While it shares many of Azo's characteristics, this is a unique product in its own right. Initial observations: Slow, but seemed faster than Azo, responds very well to water bath, double weight (but doesn't seem as thick to me as other DW papers), essentially neutral in tone, semi glossy surface, very long scale, great blacks. All the prints I made tonight were new negatives that I hadn't printed on Azo before so it's tough for me to make a direct comparison - they're in the wash now so I haven't seen them dried down, either. However, judging strictly on tonight's printing experience, I'd say Lodima is exactly what we all expected from M and P - a beautiful silver chloride paper that rivals anything else on on the market today for contact printing. Congratulations to them both for pulling this off!
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
Scott,

I cross posted your post to the Azo Forum.

My 1st impressions are posted there.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Since the paper is now available, I've merged Michael Smith's earlier status reports into one thread for those who want to read back over the history.

It looks like I merged more threads than I had intended to, including the latest update, which I had intended to keep separate, but it's all one continuous history now in one place. I'll update the title.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,673
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
curious just how "semi" gloss is it. Is it more on the matt side or more on the gloss side?
Dennis
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Here's the statement on Michael and Paula's site--

http://www.michaelandpaula.com/mp/newpaper.html

The new paper should be available from them, they currently say, in various sizes, G2 and G3, in "early 2009."

I don't know how early is "early," but I'd suspect it would be at least a few months from now to get some feed back from the first general users.
 

JLP

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,608
Location
Oregon
Format
Multi Format
Dennis, The new Lodima paper is very similar to the Canadian Azo in surface gloss. I don't have any means to measure so this is purely a subjective opinion but i would not call it a semi gloss paper.

jan
 

skillian

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
277
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Format
8x10 Format
Agree with Jan on the surface - my initial comments above were made while the prints were in the wash so I hadn't seen them dried down yet. This is clearly a very fine paper. I hope they get the support they need to move forward with G2 and G3 versions.
 

c6h6o3

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
My first impressions:

I've still got prints in the fixer and I'm typing this with a nitrile glove on my printing hand, so please bear in mind that what I write is a very cursory impression.

This paper needs a visibly stained negative if you're going to expose under a 300 watt bulb. Its frequency response is very different from Azo's. I first attempted to print negatives developed in Harvey's 777, which has no visible stain (although I've always believed it has invisible stain in the UV region). 777 negatives which print well on Azo with a 15 click exposure (I use a cadence of 100 beats/min.) turn nearly black with only 10 clicks on Lodima. I tried 4 different negatives this way and even the densest of them would only tolerate a 5 click (3 sec.) exposure to yield a good print. This is much too fast for me to control well. BUT, then I got out some semi-stand negatives developed in Pyrocat-HD. What a difference. Now 20 clicks of the metronome is too short a time. I'm getting beautiful results with negatives I heretofore considered unprintable.

BTW, I don't regard Lodima as any more contrasty than Azo (American, 1 minute) G2. Seems about the same. It appeared that way at first because of the speed, but I think it's just about right for a grade 2. It has by far the densest black I've ever seen in any paper. Blacker even than Azo G4.

It's definitely different than Azo. It'll take some adjustments in the way we all work, but my initial impressions are quite favorable.

Scott, how do the highlights dry down?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
C6H6O3;

Very interesting.

This exposure difference indicates a different visible/UV sensitivity ratio in the new paper compared to Azo. I would suspect that those that use UV to print will see some difference as well, maybe a speed increase. IDK for sure. I would have to run a wedge spectrogram on it.

PE
 

skillian

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
277
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Format
8x10 Format
Hey Jim,

Highlights dried down a touch - nothing significant, but noticeable.
 

jgjbowen

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
879
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Large Format
PE,

I use a "cold one" Azo head (UV) to expose my prints. My exposures for Lodima are approx 1/3 of what they are for the 03/06 Grade 3 Azo. In other words 30 seconds for Grade 3 Azo = ~10 seconds with Lodima. My Grade 2 Azo (Rochester) is faster than Lodima. My Canadian Grade 2 Azo is slower than Lodima.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…