• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Living photographers you most admire

Cool as Ice

A
Cool as Ice

  • 0
  • 1
  • 60

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,707
Messages
2,844,526
Members
101,481
Latest member
YYslides
Recent bookmarks
0
Ah ok got it. Makes sense I guess. I normally try to stick to the unwritten rule "if you don't have anything nice to say about someone who is not present, don't say anything at all". But I don't mind alternative opinions on some of the people whose work I admire.

Well, artists are a curious cocktail of ego and insecurity, aren’t they? I only wish Raymond Depardon were here to “defend” himself — though something tells me that, deep down, he probably knows his own limits… like the fact that he’ll never be Kertész!
 
he probably knows his own limits… like the fact that he’ll never be Kertész!

No one other than Kertesz can be Kertesz. He existed in his time with his experience - that time is over and done, as is he. Depardon could just as easily be a camel as he could be Kertesz - it's not a limitation.

artists are a curious cocktail of ego and insecurity, aren’t they?

Caricatures of artists are, at least.
 
  • albireo
  • albireo
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
No one other than Kertesz can be Kertesz. He existed in his time with his experience - that time is over and done, as is he. Depardon could just as easily be a camel as he could be Kertesz - it's not a limitation.

I don’t quite get the point. Are we saying we can’t use Kertész’s work as a comparison just because he’s gone? If his photos still move us, doesn’t that prove his art transcends time? We’re talking about photography here, right? It’s not like Kertész was using a telescope or something.

Caricatures of artists are, at least.

I’d argue that all artists need to be selfish to create — it kind of comes with the territory. And honestly… that’s perfectly fine.

"I am selfish, but that's an attribute that all artists possess."

Robert Mapplethorpe
 
Are we saying we can’t use Kertész’s work as a comparison just because he’s gone?

No. But not being able to be him is not a limitation. No one can be him. If you copy him, you are copying him - not being him. Of course his work is available for comparison with the work of other people - but notice that word "work". That's what can be compared. You don't know Depardon and you didn't know Kertesz.

I’d argue that all artists need to be selfish to create

You didn't mention selfishness. You mentioned ego and insecurity.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom